الخميس، 29 مارس 2012

Hadith on Tribalism: Whoever fights against Muslims for the sake of tribal bigotry, I have nothing to do with him | Daily Hadith Online الحديث اليومي

Mishary Al Afasi Surah As Sajda 1-22

Surah Al Mulk Video by Mishary Al Afasi WITH ENGLISH! مشاري- سورة الملك

Surah Al Mulk Video by Mishary Al Afasi WITH ENGLISH! مشاري- سورة الملك

iERA - Islamic Education and Research Academy

Quran Message (quranmessage) on Twitter

Hadith on Refuge: Seek refuge in Allah alone from the trials of life and death | Daily Hadith Online الحديث اليومي

The Greatest Commandment in the Bible and the Qur'an

(5) Wall PhotosThe Greatest Commandment in the Bible and the Qur'an

Some will say that this whole discussion over the divinity of Jesus is unnecessary. They say, the important thing is to accept Jesus as your personal savior. On the contrary, the Bible’s writers stressed that, in order to be saved, it is necessary to understand who exactly is God. Failure to understand this would be to violate the first and greatest of all the commandments in the Bible. This commandment was emphasized by Jesus, on whom be peace, when a teacher of the Law of Moses asked him: “‘Of all the commandments, which is the most important?’ ‘The most important one,’ answered Jesus, ‘is this: Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is one. Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength.’” (Mark 12:28-30).

Notice that Jesus was quoting the first commandment from the book of Deuteronomy 6:4-5. Jesus confirmed not only that this commandment is still valid, but also that it is the most important of all the commandments. If Jesus thought that he himself is God, why did not he say so? Instead, he stressed that God is one. The man who questioned Jesus understood this, and what the man says next makes it clear that God is not Jesus, for he said to Jesus: “‘Well said, teacher,’ the man replied. ‘You are right in saying that God is one and there is no other but him.’” (Mark 12:32).

Now if Jesus was God, he would have told the man so. Instead, he let the man refer to God as someone other than Jesus, and he even saw that the man had spoken wisely: “When Jesus saw that he had answered wisely, he said to him, ‘You are not far from the kingdom of God.’” (Mark 12:34). If Jesus knew that God is a trinity, why did not he say so? Why did not he say that God is one in three, or three in one? Instead, he declared that God is one. True imitators of Jesus will imitate him also in this declaration of God’s oneness. They will not add the word three where Jesus never said it.

Does salvation depend on this commandment? Yes, says the Bible! Jesus made this clear when another man approached Jesus to learn from him (see Mark 10:17-29).

The man fell on his knees and said to Jesus: “Good teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?” 

Jesus replied: 

“Why do you call me good? No one is good — except God alone.” (Mark 10:17-18).

By so saying, Jesus made a clear distinction between himself and God. Then he proceeded with the answer to the man’s question about how to get salvation. Jesus told him: “If you want to enter life, obey the commandments.” (Matthew 19:17, also see Mark 10:19).

Remember that the most important of all the commandments, according to Jesus, is to know God as the only God. Jesus further emphasized this in the Gospel According to John. In John 17:1, Jesus lifted his eyes to heaven and prayed, addressing God as Father. Then in verse three, he said to God as follows: “Now this is eternal life: that they may know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent.” (John 17:3).

This proves beyond doubt that if people want to get eternal life they must know that the One, whom Jesus was praying to, is the only true God, and they must know that Jesus was sent by the true God. Some say that the Father is God, the Son is God, and the Holy Ghost is God. But Jesus said that the Father alone is the only true God. True followers of Jesus will follow him in this too. Jesus had said that his true followers are those who hold to his teachings. He said: “If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples.” (John 8:31). His teaching is that people must continue to keep the commandments, especially the first commandment which emphasizes that God is alone, and that God should be loved with all our hearts and all our strengths.

*We love Jesus, but we must not love him as God. 

*Today many love Jesus more than they love God. 
This is because they see God as a vengeful person who wanted to exact a penalty from them, and they see Jesus as the savior who rescued them from the wrath of God. 
Yet God is our only savior. According to Isaiah 43:11, 

God said: “I, even I, am the LORD, and apart from me there is no savior.” Also God said according to Isaiah 45:21-22: “Was it not I, the LORD? 

And there is no God apart from me, a righteous God and a Savior; there is none but me. Turn to me and be saved, all you ends of the earth; for I am God, and there is no other.”

The Quran confirms the first commandment and addresses it to all humankind (see the Holy Quran 2:163). And God declares that true believers love Him more than anyone else or anything else (Quran 2:165)

Did Prophet Muhammad allow Muslims to lie to disbelievers? Taqiyya explained | Faith in Allah

Islam Events - Sheikh Yusuf Estes Biography

(3) Satanic Verse Lie Exposed is NO More ... i mean exposed

(3) Satanic Verse Lie Ex

Satanic Verse Lie Exposed is NO More ... i mean exposed

by Answering Christanity on Tuesday, October 18, 2011 at 7:45am ·
Satanic Verse  Lie Exposed is NO More ... i mean exposed

another popular Claim from Our Hypocrite Christians .

To all those haters i want to share my own Quote

Lies can shine ONLY FOR FEW DAYS,But Truth Shines for Ever.

they have written:

Here are reproduce the statement from a notorious site;(all underline text are from a anti-islamic website)

"According to al-Tabari,

When the Messenger of God saw how his tribe turned their backs on him and was grieved to see them shunning the message he had brought to them from God, he longed in his soul that something would come to him from God which would reconcile him with his tribe. With his love for his tribe and his eagerness for their welfare it would have delighted him if some of the difficulties which they made for him could have been smoothed out, and he debated within himself and fervently desired such an outcome. Then God revealed:

By the Star when it sets, your comrade does not err, nor is he deceived; nor does he speak out of (his own) desire . . .
and when he came to the words:

Have you thought upon al-Lat and al-‘Uzza and Manat, the third, the other?

Satan cast on his tongue, because of his inner debates and what he desired to bring to his people, the words:
These are the high-flying cranes; verily their intercession is accepted with approval. (Al-Tabari, p. 108)"

The polytheists were delighted that Muhammad had at last approved of their gods. To return the kindness, they "prostrated themselves because of the reference to their gods which they had heard, so that there was no one in the mosque, believer or unbeliever, who did not prostrate himself" (p. 109).

Muhammad’s friendly relations with the polytheists were short-lived, however, for he soon learned that his verses praising pagan idols came not from God, but from Satan. Saddened to recognize his treachery against Allah, Muhammad lamented: "I have fabricated things against God and have imputed to Him words which He has not spoken" (p. 111). Yet "Gabriel" comforted Muhammad, informing him that all prophets fall for Satan’s tricks from time to time. This staggering and unbelievable claim even found its way into the Qur’an:

"And We did not send before you any apostle or prophet, but when he desired, the Shaitan made a suggestion respecting his desire; but Allah annuls that which the Shaitan casts, then does Allah establish His communications, and Allah is Knowing, Wise." (Surah 22:52)"

Our Response :

1-About the Book, Tarikh ar-Rusul wal-Maluk, commonly known as Tarikh al-Tabari:

First of all we ought to know that Tarikh al-Tabari is not a Hadith book but only a history book (but in all anti-islamic website they will that It hadith )thus its authenticity level is far below than any Hadith book. Infact it is one of the earlier books giving much raw material about the life of the Holy Prophet (PBUH) and generations immediately after him. Everything in it is not necessarily true.

Now...What Imam Tabari said about his book :

Imam Tabari himself writes in his preface (Muqaddama) to the book.

"Let him who examines this book of mine know that I have relied, as regards everything I mention therein which I stipulate to be described by me, solely upon what has been transmitted to me by way of reports which I cite therein and traditions which I ascribe to their narrators, to the exclusion of what may be apprehended by rational argument or deduced by the human mind, except in very few cases. This is because knowledge of the reports of men of the past and of contemporaneous views of men of the present do not reach the one who has not witnessed them nor lived in their times except through the accounts of reporters and the transmission of transmitters, to the exclusion of rational deduction and mental inference. Hence, if I mention in this book a report about some men of the past, which the reader of listener finds objectionable or worthy of censure because he can see no aspect of truth nor any factual substance therein, let him know that this is not to be attributed to us but to those who transmitted it to us and we have merely passed this on as it has been passed on to us." (Tarikh al-Tabari Vol.1 page 3)

He has only rendered what he heard and he left it to us, the readers, to examine the truth of statements through internal & external examination and rational testing. Everyone remember this point : Tabari died as Muslim.It means he itself didn;t believed many thing which he have written in book.else every human will wish to his soul. He also knew Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah...

2-Internal Examination:

Now let’s try to read that words which according to this story Holy Prophet (PBUH) allegedly recited with its context. The words in italic and underline are the words which the Holy Prophet (PBUH) allegedly recited;

"Have ye seen Lat. and 'Uzza, And another, the third (goddess), Manat?" "These are exalted goddesses; indeed their intercession may be accepted." "What! for you the male sex, and for Him, the female? Behold, such would be indeed a division most unfair! These are nothing but names which ye have devised,- ye and your fathers,- for which Allah has sent down no authority (whatever). They follow nothing but conjecture and what their own souls desire! - Even though there has already come to them Guidance from their Lord!" (Al-Quran 53:19-23 with that supposed statement inserted)

Now any one can observe, unless he is a cynic, that these words no where fit in the context. How it be that first those pagan deities are praised and in the very next verse condemned that you attribute females to God? And if the story is true than were all the ever criticizing Pagans of Quraysh out of their senses that they prostrated along with Muhammad on the premise that he had praised their deities? What non-sense can be greater than this? This passage if read along with those alleged verses spoken by Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) is meaning less.

3-External Examination:

Now this incident happened just after the Emigration to Abyssinia that took place in the 5th year after the Holy Prophet (PBUH) announced his prophethood. And it was then when these verses of Surah an-Najam (#53) were revealed. (Maududi's Introduction to Surah 53)

And the verses of Surah Asraa, # 17, (also called Surah Bani Israel) i.e. verses # 73-75, in which as per the story the Holy Prophet was admonished, were obviously revealed after the incident of Mir'aj (Ascension to the Heavens) that took place in the 12th year after the Prophetic Call. (Maududi's Introduction to Surah 17)

And the verses of Surah al-Hajj (22:52) mentioned in the story wherein as it says the Holy Prophet (PBUH) was consoled later, were revealed in the first year after Hijrah. (Maududi's Introduction to Surah 22)

Now if we believe this whole account then it means that Holy Prophet (PBUH)-God Forbid-praised and worshiped the idols and so did his companions in 5th year of the prophetic Call and they were admonished some 6 years later in the year 12th year of the prophetic call and when Holy Prophet (PBUH) felt sorry for all this he was consoled again some two and half years later in the 1st year of Hijrah. Can anything be more ridiculous then this? Is it anyway possible?
And interestingly we don’t find any other such incident in which Holy Prophet (PBUH) or his companions ever uttered even a single soft word for the pagans or their deities before being admonished by ALLAH 6 years later. Do you remember what you read right in the beginning?

Just in case you don’t remember again see, Imam Tabari wrote;

"Hence, if I mention in this book a report about some men of the past, which the reader of listener finds objectionable or worthy of censure because he can see no aspect of truth nor any factual substance therein, let him know that this is not to be attributed to us but to those who transmitted it to us and we have merely passed this on as it has been passed on to us."

4-What really happened and how the story got narrated?

Actually what happened was only what is recorded in Authentic Hadith books like Bukhari etc. where we read;

Narrated Ibn Abbas: The Prophet (pbuh) prostrated while reciting An-Najm and with him prostrated the Muslims, the pagans, the jinns, and all human beings. (Bukhari, Book 19, Hadith 177)

Infact it was the eloquence and beauty of the Quran depicting its Divine Origin that made the pagans of Makkah to spontaneously fall down in prostration, on hearing the last verse of Surah 53.

"But fall ye down in prostration to Allah, and adore (Him)!"

The Holy Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and his companions prostrated as they were commanded so in the verse.

After the incident took place the Quraish later realized what they had done by prostrating on hearing the Glorious Quran. Now to hide their 'guilt' they concocted this story that Muhammad infact spoke something in favour of their deities and thus they agreed to make a patch-up. This was a really hypocrisy and sham that has been unveiled through internal and external examination of this fabricated story.

5-Further Criticism:

All these points are so strong and quieting that we need not to look for the reliability of its narrators as this cant be true in any case no matter how strong the chain of narrators may be. But only to give another blow to already fragile references of Christians who use this story let us have a look on the opinions of great scholars about its line of transmission;

Ibn Kathir said; ‘All the links of this Tradition are unauthentic and I have found no correct version of this with continuous links.’ (Ibn Kathir in his Tafsir 5/441-442)

Shaukani says, ‘There is nothing true in it and none of its links is proved.’ (Fath al-Qadeer 5/128)

Ibn Jawzi says: ‘This is not correct.’ (Zaad al-Muyassar 4/391)

When Ibn Khuzaimah was asked about it, he said, "This story has been invented by heretics". (Tafsir al-Raazi 11/134)

Baihaqi said; "This story has not been proved to be correct by the rules of reporting". (Tafsir a-Raazi 11/135)

Qazi `Ayad says, "The very fact that this tradition is neither contained in any of the authentic collections of Hadith nor has it been related in an authentic way by authentic reporters shows its weakness". (Al-Shifa 2/125)

Besides them, Imam Razi (in his Tafsir 11/135), Qazi Abu Bakr Ibn al-`Arabi (Al-Shifa 2/126), Alusi (in his Tafsir 13/99) etc. have rejected it altogether.

6-On the other two verses in the story:

Now some one may say that why than in other two verses Prophet Muhammad has been reproved and then later given a sort of consolation? Let us examine the other two verses as well so that we chase the evil to its utter helplessness.

According to the story Holy prophet was given a reproof in Surah 17 verses 73-75. the verse are;

"And their purpose was to tempt thee away from that which We had revealed unto thee, to substitute in our name something quite different; (in that case), behold! they would certainly have made thee (their) friend! And had We not given thee strength, thou wouldst nearly have inclined to them a little. In that case We should have made thee taste an equal portion (of punishment) in this life, and an equal portion in death: and moreover thou wouldst have found none to help thee against Us!" (Al-Quran 17:73-75)

This simply refers to the fact that the Quraish tried to tempt the Holy Prophet with worldly things so that he may become some what soft towards their disbelief just as they tried it when they send their delegation to his uncle Abi Talib but infact got the most resolute answer that;

"Even if they put Sun on my right hand and Moon on the left I'll not renounce my Message."

Then ALLAH tells him that the resolution shown on your part was also granted by ALLAH. And if you had fallen into their trap you would have erred and given a severe reproof. Now what most important here is "And had We not given thee strength thou wouldst nearly have inclined to them a little." This part of the verse explicitly rules out the notion that he anytime actually fell into their trap. This is plain enough to understand that with ALLAH's help never did he yield to any temptation and he was able to remain firm only with ALLAH's help who is the Greatest and the Most Glorious. This verse has indeed nothing to do with this fabricated story.

Further the fabricated story says that having being reproved the Holy Prophet was much grieved and sad and was later somewhat consoled by ALLAH Almighty in the following words of Surah Hajj;

"Never did We send a messenger or a prophet before thee, but, when he framed a desire, Satan threw some (vanity) into his desire: but Allah will cancel anything (vain) that Satan throws in, and Allah will confirm (and establish) His Signs: for Allah is full of Knowledge and Wisdom:" (Al-Quran 22:52)

The Significant Arabic word here is "Tamanna" about which eminent scholar Maulana Maududi writes in his commentary Tafhim-ul-Quran;

"The Arabic word tamanna has two meanings: "desire" and "to recite" something. If the first meaning is taken, it will imply: "Satan tried to prevent the fulfillment of his desire." If the second meaning is taken, it will imply: "When the Prophet recited the Revelations, Satan created different sorts of doubts about its truth and meanings in the minds of the people." If the first meaning is adopted, it will imply: "Allah fulfils the Prophet's desire and makes his Mission successful in spite of the obstacles of Satan and confirms the truth of His Revelations by fulfilling His promises to the Prophet". In case of the second meaning, it will imply: "Allah eradicates all the doubts and objections inspired by Satan in the hearts of the people and clarifies the confusion created about any verse of the Qur'an in subsequent Revelations".

This again proves that this verse also has no special relation with the story in question.


All these above points prove that the story is absolutely baseless and fabricated. Some earlier people did put into writing but they did subject its acceptance to rational examination & internal and external criticism which as we have seen prove its being fabricated & baseless.

8-Why Christians refer to such baseless traditions:

Actually the fact is that Christians try to prove that Jesus (peace be upon him) is God Incarnate. When they can’t do so even from their own book of authority, the Bible, they get frustrated. And ever-increasing number of reverts to Islam and homage paid to the Holy Prophet (PBUH) & Islam by some of their people frustrates them further. Then in order to deviate the attention of people and in vain attempts to get rid of their frustration they start speaking and yelling obscenities against the Holy Prophet (PBUH) and Islam and while doing so they use such baseless and dirty arguments which only proves that they are Devil Incarnates.

Lets See What Bible Says :

We Muslims believe Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) to be Last & Final Messenger & Prophet of ALLAH. What these Christians are trying to do is to refute his status as Prophet of God by referring to such baseless stories.

Now let us make a counter argument;

Christians believe that Jesus (Peace be upon him) was God, a Divine Being. Now in the Bible we read that;

"Then was Jesus led up of the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted of the devil."(Matthew 4:1) & "Being forty days tempted of the devil."(Luke 4:2)

Though he didn't fall into the trap of the Devil but he was tempted. No Christian can challenge this for it is in his own book of Authority. We Muslims don't even say this. Its Bible. And about God we know that Bible says;

"God cannot be tempted with evil." (James 1:13)

Now reading these three verses makes it clear that even according to the Bible Jesus (peace be upon him) is not God for God cannot be tempted with evil and Jesus was, according to the gospels, tempted of evil.

Remember Jesus (PBUH) said; "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)


INDEED ALLAH KNOWS THE BESTposed is NO More ... i mean exposed

Hadith on Prayer: Between Faith and Disbelief is the Abandoning of Prayer | Daily Hadith Online الحديث اليومي

Hadith on Sunnah: There is no harm in narrating from the Children of Israel for the purpose of reinforcing established Islamic teachings | Daily Hadith Online الحديث اليومي

Hadith on Bloodshed: The Son of Adam, Cain, shares the burden of every murder because he started the practice of unlawful killing | Daily Hadith Online الحديث اليومي

Hadith on Asking: Let one of you ask Allah alone for all of his needs | Daily Hadith Online الحديث اليومي

المكتبة الصوتية للقرآن الكريم - MP3 Quran | أحمد بن علي العجمي

Islam in world's languages: Holy Quran, Books, Audio, Articles, Fatawa, Video

حكم سب الصحابة [ من أقوال الأئمة ] - عربي

O que é o Islam - Português

The Trinity makes no sense. It isn't logical. | Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry

False dilemmas and the Trinity (Logical fallacies and horns of the dilemma)

The Trinity: Not a Logical Contradiction - Article