الاثنين، 4 ديسمبر 2023

A Brief Acquaintance with The Rise_and Orginis of #Grave #Worship In The #Ummah #PDF

 

A Brief Acquaintance with The Rise_and Orginis of #Grave #Worship In The #Ummah #PDF
=======================
#Raafidi Terrorist And #Grave #Worshipper – [Mujtabaa Al-Mahdi]- Misidentifies So-called #Wahhaabees As #Terrorists And Makes Unrestricted Takfeer – [A Brief Admonition By Shaikh Rabee (hafidhahullaah)]
In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.
The Raafidi Mujtabaa Al-Mahdee Ash-Sheeraazee stated after the blowing up of the tomb of Ali Ibn Muhammad Al-Haadi:
Allaah (The Most High) said in His noble Book:
إِنَّمَا جَزَاءُ الَّذِينَ يُحَارِبُونَ اللَّهَ وَرَسُولَهُ وَيَسْعَوْنَ فِي الْأَرْضِ فَسَادًا أَنْ يُقَتَّلُوا أَوْ يُصَلَّبُوا أَوْ تُقَطَّعَ أَيْدِيهِمْ وَأَرْجُلُهُمْ مِنْ خِلَافٍ أَوْ يُنْفَوْا مِنَ الْأَرْضِ ۚ ذَٰلِكَ لَهُمْ خِزْيٌ فِي الدُّنْيَا ۖ وَلَهُمْ فِي الْآخِرَةِ عَذَابٌ عَظِيمٌ
The recompense of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and do mischief in the land is only that they shall be killed or crucified or their hands and their feet be cut off on the opposite sides, or be exiled from the land. That is their disgrace in this world, and a great torment is theirs in the Hereafter. [5:33]
If this noble ayah is not a truthful confirmation about the Wahhaabi- the disbeliever, the terrorist, the Nawaasib (haters of the prophet’s family), the Wahshee (beast)], then who else does this noble ayah confirms their affair?! If this noble ayah is not a confirmation of the affair of those men of religion and those who are not men of religion – the helpers of the Wahhaabees- the disbelievers, the Nawaasib (haters of the prophet’s family), Wuhoosh (beasts etc.)]- due to the likes of this action (i.e. the blowing up of the tomb of Ali ibn Muhammad Al-Haadi), then who else does this noble ayah confirm their affair? If we disbelieve in the noble Qur’aan, then let us be brave and make clear what we believe. If we believe in the noble Qur’aan, then it is obligatory to kill the Wahhaabi-the terrorist, the Naasibi (hater of the prophet’s family), the Wahshee (beast)]. And whoever helps the Wahhaabi–whether he is a man of religion or not–with the likes of this action (i.e. the blowing up of that tomb) and others, then it is obligatory to kill him. And whoever says that it is not obligatory to kill these people and those who aid them, then he has announced his disbelief in the noble Qur’aan.
Look at this! He utilises the term Wahhaabi and attributes it to terrorism when it is the case that the call of Imaam Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhaab (rahimahullaah) is based upon the way of the Sahaabah and the great scholars of the ummah in creed, methodology, politics and adhering to the Book of Allaah and the Sunnah of the Messenger. (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam)
[An Excerpt from: (من هم الارهابييون–اهم السلفيون ام الروافض -Who are the terrorists–the #Salafis or the rawaafid? pages 6-7. Slightly paraphrased]
NB: It is well known that the #worship of #graves and #tombs is haraam and is from the affairs of #Shirk, however, to take the law into one’s hand and #destroy them is not allowed, as this is the responsibility of the #Muslim #rulers and the authorities in the land.

True prophets and noble ones chooses of god according to bible

 

True prophets and noble ones chooses of god according to bible
♦️♦️♦️
David had six wives and many Maid.
(2 Samuel 5:13; 1 Chronicles 3:1-9, 14:3.)
♦️♦️♦️
Solomon had 700 wives and 300 Maid.
(1 Kings 11:3)
♦️♦️♦️
Rehoboam had 18 wives and 60 Maid.
( 2 Chronicles 11:21)
In Exodus 21:10, a man can marry an infinite amount of women without any limits to how many he can marry.
In 2 Samuel 5:13; 1 Chronicles 3:1-9, 14:3, King David had six wives and numerous concubines.
In 1 Kings 11:3, King Solomon had 700 wives and 300 concubines.
In 2 Chronicles 11:21, King Solomon's son Rehoboam had 18 wives and 60 concubines.
In Deuteronomy 21:15 "If a man has two wives, and he loves one but not the other, and both bear him sons...."

This is why Prophet Muhammad killed the Jews of Beni Quraida

 

This is why Prophet Muhammad killed the Jews of Beni Quraida
Now if anyone asks this question again
The answer would be👇🏻
🤔Why didn't prophet Muhammad peace be upon him kill the Jews of Beni Qaynuqaa?
🤔Why didn't prophet Muhammad peace be upon him kill the Jews of Beni Badeer?
🤔Why didn't prophet Muhammad peace be upon him kill the Jews of Khaybar?
🌿Simply because the other Jewish tribes weren't spiers. And spiers are immediately killed in every epoque of history
So, "Deceiver of his country" is killed with no sympathy in all countries of the world throughout history till now
If any American soldier gives Korea Secrets of the Pentagon or of USA administration to Korea will Trump receive him with flowers and give him pizza and ice cream or chop his head
I guess the answer is clear😂
No country ever in history forgave betrayals
Never happened!!!
👇see 👇today👇
15/03/2018
AlJazeera BBC etc all mention the following
/// Russia and poisening 23 betrayals of Russia for other countries ///
Vladimir potin orders to kill several of these viruses for him
Killed Nicolay His rival killed in his house
grochkov with neuron gaz
Great betraying Woman too Yuria Servis Kripal killed too
Potin decided to kill him with a poison
Skripal and his daughter Yulia were found semiconscious on a park bench in the English town of Salisbury on March 4th. Officials later determined that they had been poisoned with Novichok, a deadly nerve agent developed in the Soviet Union. The British government has accused Russia of manufacturing and stockpiling the agent, as well as training “special units” to employ it against Russia’s enemies.
Watch more on BBC news here on the killing of Russian spier Litvinenko
If the betrayer isn't killed the value, splendor and dignity of the state is humiliated
It becomes no longer a state but a stable of pigs😉😂
There will come more betrayers who will steal the secrets of the state again and again.
As you know all countries of the world agree that in case a betrayer reveals the secrets of the state.. He is to be killed.
🏳now how about the Jews of Beni Quraida who did malicious work and made enemies of the Muslim state attack Muslims bearing in mind that they signed the contract with Prophet Muhammad not to do so
Would they still be revered and be given an honor attestation for example
Don't treat Islam with double standars
Be reasonable please👊✊😎
Ironically the Jews were being judged according to their own law! The very thing that James Arlandson is trying to call brutal and unfair is actually the law that is found in his own Bible!...
Deuteronomy 20:10-12
10 When you march up to attack a city, make its people an offer of peace. 11 If they accept and open their gates, all the people in it shall be subject to forced labor and shall work for you. 12 If they refuse to make peace and they engage you in battle, lay siege to that city. 13 When the LORD your God delivers it into your hand, put to the sword all the men in it. 14 As for the women, the children, the livestock and everything else in the city, you may take these as plunder for yourselves. And you may use the plunder the LORD your God gives you from your enemies
Conclusion
To most people it could appear that the punishment that the Jews faced was too extreme. However, on the contrary what was more extreme is how the Jews deceptively tricked the Muslims by breaking the treaty and wanted to end their very existence. For such treachery they indeed deserved what they got. If any Christian wants to condemn this judgment then he is actually condemning his own Bible because it was by a law found in their Bible which the Jews were judged by. Plus it was not Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) who issued the order; it was Saad bin Muadh whom the Jews selected to judge their fate.
The Muslims needed to make examples out of these people. You can't expect the Muslims to go and forgive those who fight against them. That would just encourage more people to go and fight against the Muslims. If you think about it, the Muslims resorted to such extreme measures only when it was necessary and not for revenge. It was necessary to show everyone that you cannot go and mess with Muslims by fighting against them. The Prophet (peace be upon him) was in charge of the security of his people. If he went on forgiving anyone who attacked them, then this would only encourage people to fight against the Muslims, since they would think that even if they lose the Muslims will simply forgive them.
IIN website