How many shared Jokes, tweets and ended up promoting this shia known as @ShaykhAzhar

Shia-ism is NOT Islam

٢٣ ديسمبر ٢٠١٩ · 

How many shared Jokes, tweets and ended up promoting this shia known as @ShaykhAzhar :Let us look into Why Twitter’s Favorite Guru Sheikh is: A #Staunch Sectarian #Fake
“Shaykh” Azhar Nasser’s rise to fame on twitter is an interesting (yet unsurprising) phenomenon on the Twittersphere, especially Muslim Twitter

Azhar was successfully able to take advantage of various factors to promote his personal brand on this site:

> His “traditional Sheikh” look
> Humor (it’s stolen, but we’ll get to that later)
> His willingness to address apparently controversial topics many sheikhs do not address.

With these 3 main factors, Azhar was successfully able to amass an impressive follower count of 74,500

>>Exposing Azhar’s sectarian bigotry.

Azhar Nasser, a Shi’ite apologist, treads carefully when dealing with his Sunni audience. However, he occasionally has a slip of the tongue, where he exposes his true sectarian outlook to all of his followers.

In these screenshots, Azhar displays his hidden sectarian bigotry

He falsely slanders ‘Umar accusing him of murdering Fatimah, which is a defective historical claim exclusively upheld by Shias today

He slanders Abu Bakr: the Prophet’s companion, father-in-law and best friend

Azhar has the audacity to take subtle jabs at some of the most revered and respected figures in Islam: the Prophet’s companions, brothers-in-arms and friends who fought and suffered by his side since day one

His staunch Shi’ite hatred & sectarianism blind him from this reality.

Azhar takes advantage of any instance where he can push forth his filthy polemical sectarian talking points, in an attempt to cautiously polarize his Sunni audience

Here he subtly attempts to discredit Sunni Islam by pushing forth his false Shi’ite narrative on the Sahabah

=======================

In his tweets, he attempts to present himself as an objective and skeptical bystander who is simply being critical.

However, what the reader may not notice is that Azhar’s criticism is exclusively limited to SUNNI sources.

Azhar does not have the courage (nor the intellectual honesty) to openly criticize reports that are deemed authentic in SHI’ITE sources.

Why?

It’s because he’d lose his credibility among Shi’i official religious instituions (which are his sole claim to religious authority)