be with god: أغسطس 2011

الثلاثاء، 30 أغسطس 2011

‪Street Salah prayer ghuraba nasheed khalid yasin‬‏ - YouTube

الأحد، 28 أغسطس 2011

Exopolitica Potencial Colima Mexico (2)

Adam : Adam
Idris : Enoch
Nuh : Noah
Hud : Hod
Salih : Shelah
... Ibrahim : Abraham
Lut : Lot
Ismail : Ishmael
Ishak : Isaac
Yakub : Jacob
Yusuf : Joseph
Ayub : Job
Syuaib : Jethro
Musa : Moses
Harun : Aaron
Zulkifli : Ezekiel
Daud : David
Sulaiman : Solomon
Ilyas : Elijah
Ilyasa' : Elisha
Yunus : Jonah
Zakaria : Zechariah
Yahya : John the Baptist
Isa : Jesus

Bonus Pack

Taurat : Torah (Old Testament)
Zabur : Psalms (Old Testament)
Injil : Evangel (Good News / New Testament )

Talmud (Jewish Hadith)
Midrash (Oral Torah)
Kabbalah (Jewish Tassawuf)

Prophet Muhammad S.A.W: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v

الاثنين، 22 أغسطس 2011

we belibve in all meassngers

“THE DIFFERENT BETWEEN THE MUSLIM – CHRISTIAN AND JEW”

ABOUT THE BELIEF OF PROPHETS AND MESSENGER:

THE JEW: They believed only from,
...
ADAM,
NOAH,
ABRHAM,
MOSES
DAVID
SOLOMON
And they reject JESUS and MUHAMMAD (pbut) )

THE CHRISTIAN: They believed only from,

ADAM,
NOAH,
ABRAHAM,
MOSES, DAVID,
SOLOMON
JESUS
And they reject MUHAMAD (pbut)

THE MUSLIM: They believed from,

ADAM,
NOAH,
ABRAHAM,
MOSES,
DAVID,
SOLOMON,
JESUS
And Muhammad (pbut)

ABOUT THE BOOKS - THE JEW:

They believed only the TORA and they reject the INJEEL (Gospel ) of Jesus

ABOUT THE BOOKS - THE CHRISTIAN:

They believed both the Old and New Testament

ABOUT THE BOOKS THE MUSLIM:

They believed The INJEEL and TORA [in original form] and the Holy Qur’an is the Last Testament.

WE BELIEVED ALL THE BOOKS:

Quran 3:84 Say: "We believe in Allah and in what has been revealed to us and what was revealed to Abraham Ismail Isaac Jacob and the Tribes and in (Books) given to Moses Jesus and the Prophets from their Lord; we make no distinction between one and another among them and to Allah (The Almighty God) do we bow our will (as Muslim)."

THE QURAN IS A CONFIRMATION OF ALL THE BOOKS:

Qur’an 12:111 indeed in their stories, there is a lesson for men of understanding. It (the Qur’an) is not a forged statement but a confirmation of (Allah’s existing Books) which were before it The Taurat (The Old Testament) the Law given to Moses and The Injeel (The Gospel ) given to Jesus and other Scriptures of Allah) and a detailed explanation of everything, and guidance and a mercy for the people who believe.See More

الأحد، 21 أغسطس 2011

mercy in islam

THE MERCY OF ISLAM :

Umar ibn al-Khattab the second caliph of Islam, once passed by a old man begging in front of a house. Umar asked him which religious community he belonged to. The man said he was Jewish. Umar then asked him, ‘What has brought you to this?’ The old man said, ‘Do not ask me; ask …poverty, and old age.’ Umar took the man to his own home, helped him from his personal money, an...d then ordered the head of the treasury, ‘You must look after this man and others like him. We have not treated him fairly. He should not have spent the best years of his life among us to find misery in his old age.’ Umar also relieved him and others in his situation of paying the jizya.......

Another example is found in Khalid ibn al-Walid the man who the prophet saw named him " teh sword of allah " in his letter to the people of the Iraqi city of Hira. It contains the terms of truce he offered them:

‘If God gives us victory, the people of the covenant will be protected. They have rights promised to them by God. It is the strictest covenant God has made incumbent on any of His prophets. They are also held by the duties that it places upon them and must not violate it. If they are conquered, they will live comfortably with everything due to them. I am commanded to exempt from jizya the elderly who cannot work, the disabled, or the poor who receive charity from their own community. The treasury will provide for them and their dependants as long as they live in Muslim lands or in the communities of Muslim emigrants. If they move outside of Muslim lands, neither they nor their dependants shall be entitled to any benefits.’

In another instance, Umar ibn al-Khattab, the Muslim Caliph, was visiting Damascus. He passed by a group of Christian lepers. He ordered that they be given charity and regular stipends for food.

Umar ibn Abdul-Aziz, another Muslim Caliph, wrote to his agent in Basra, Iraq, ‘Search for the people of the covenant in your area who may have grown old, and are unable to earn, and provide them with regular stipends from the treasury to take care of their needs.’......

السبت، 20 أغسطس 2011

‪Surah Ya-Sin by Mishary Al Afasi ( Complete Surah)‬‏ - YouTube

‪Mishary al-afasy Surah Al-baqarah ( full ) with audio english translation‬‏ - YouTube

‪Surah Al Mulk Video by Mishary Al Afasi WITH ENGLISH! مشاري- سورة الملك‬‏ - YouTube

‪A Video Christians MUST See - Part 1‬‏ - YouTube

‪The Quran has mistakes?‬‏ - YouTube

follow paul or jesus

Follow Jesus or Follow Paul?

The New Testament gives us a choice; either we follow Jesus Christ, or the anti-Christ Paul of Tarsus: Each one demands his followers to accept his teachings:

Be ye followers of me… that ye remember me in all things, and keep the ordinances, as I delivered [them] to you. (1 Corinthians 11:1)

“If ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed” (John 8:31)

Amazing, the former preached against the teachings of Jesus, and the latter, (Jesus) teaches that salvation is only attained by following him. According to Deuteronomy 24:16, Ezekiel 18:20-21, and Micah 6:7-8, a man is responsible for his own sin. Jesus rejected the Pauline doctrine of “vicarious atonement”. Compare the two passages below:

And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission. (Hebrews 9:22)

Jesus was teaching his disciples in the outer court of the Temple and one of them said unto him: Master, it is said by the priests that without shedding of blood there is no remission. Can then the blood offering of the law take away sin? And Jesus answered: No blood offering, of beast or bird, or man, can take away sin, for how can the conscience be purged from sin by the shedding of innocent blood? Nay, it will increase the condemnation. (Gospel of the Nazorenes, Lection 33, verses 1-2)

Jesus was circumcised, Paul rejected circumcision:

This [is] my covenant, which ye shall keep, between me and you and thy seed after thee; Every man child among you shall be circumcised. And the uncircumcised man child whose flesh of his foreskin is not circumcised, that soul shall be cut off from his people; he hath broken my covenant. (Genesis 17:14)

When his son Isaac was eight days old, Abraham circumcised him, as God commanded him. (Genesis 21:4)

And when a stranger shall sojourn with thee, and will keep the passover to the LORD, let all his males be circumcised, and then let him come near and keep it; and he shall be as one that is born in the land: for no uncircumcised person shall eat thereof. (Exodus 12:48)

On the eighth day, when it was time to circumcise him, he was named Jesus, the name the angel had given him before he had been conceived. (Luke 2:21)

And certain men which came down from Judaea taught the brethren, [and said], Except ye be circumcised after the manner of Moses, ye cannot be saved. (Acts 15:1)

Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach [them], the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. (Matthew 5:19)

Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier [matters] of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone. (Matthew 23:23)

The Jewish Law commands the circumcision on the eighth day. The reason why Christians are not circumcised is because they follow Paul. They have broken the covenant of Circumcision according to Jesus himself (5:19)

For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but faith which worketh by love. (Galatians 5:6, KJV)

For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision has any value. The only thing that counts is faith expressing itself through love. (NIV)

The Talmud states the following to those who break the Covenant:

"The one who voids the covenant of Abraham has no portion in the world to come (Avot 3:16).

Christians may not have any “portion in the world to come” because they have totally rejected the Message of Jesus, replacing the Gospel with the Gospel of Paul.

"The Christianity which the nations claim to follow is the religion of Paul, who is admittedly the chief and almost the only theologian that the Church recognizes. Because of his betrayal of the Master's teachings, the vision of true Christianity has been so dimmed that men have been able to defend war and a host of other evils, such as flesh eating and slavery, on the authority of the Bible." (Christ or Paul? Rev. V.A. Holmes-Gore)

"Let the reader contrast the true Christian standard with that of Paul and he will see the terrible betrayal of all that the Master taught.... For the surest way to betray a great Teacher is to misrepresent his message.... That is what Paul and his followers did, and because the Church has followed Paul in his error it has failed lamentably to redeem the world.... The teachings given by the blessed Master Christ, which the disciples John and Peter and James, the brother of the Master, tried in vain to defend and preserve intact were as utterly opposed to the Pauline Gospel as the light is opposed to the darkness." (ibid, Rev. V.A. Holmes Gore)

"True Christianity, which will last forever, comes from the gospel words of Christ not from the epistles of Paul. The writings of Paul have been a danger and a hidden rock, the causes of the principal defects of Christian theology." (Ernest Renan, Saint Paul)

"There is not one word of Pauline Christianity in the characteristic utterances of Jesus.... There has really never been a more monstrous imposition perpetrated than the imposition of Paul's soul upon the soul of Jesus.... It is now easy to understand how the Christianity of Jesus... was suppressed by the police and the Church, while Paulinism overran the whole western civilized world, which was at that time the Roman Empire, and was adopted by it as its official faith. (Androcles and the Lion, George Bernard Shaw)

The Christian missionaries today are preaching the Gospel of Paul, and rejecting the Gospel of Jesus. Paul emphasized that salvation is attained through “faith and grace” which is blatantly opposite of what Jesus taught.

"Paul... did not desire to know Christ.... Paul shows us with what complete indifference the earthly life of Jesus was regarded.... What is the significance for our faith and for our religious life, the fact that the Gospel of Paul is different from the Gospel of Jesus?.... The attitude which Paul himself takes up towards the Gospel of Jesus is that he does not repeat it in the words of Jesus, and does not appeal to its authority.... The fateful thing is that the Greek, the Catholic, and the Protestant theologies all contain the Gospel of Paul in a form which does not continue the Gospel of Jesus, but displaces it." (The Quest for the Historical Jesus, Albert Schweitzer)

“We have already noted that every teaching of Jesus was already in the literature of the day….. Paul, the founder of Christianity, the writer of half the NT, almost never quotes Jesus in his letters and writings." (Professor Smith in his “The World Religions”, p 330)
Saul/Paul had set out initially to subvert Jesus’ teachings. Later he used his new doctrines to undermine the power of the Jewish church as well as the defied Roman Emperor. Paul sought to torpedo Judaism in its calcified form, its narrow interpretation of the Judaic law. Jesus had initiated this process but did not subvert the law. Paul had no such inhibitions; he rejected wholesale many fundamental laws of God. In the attempt Paul succeeded in undermining both the Jewish and Nazarene teachings. He steered Christ’s teachings away from monotheism and from the Jews, (the lost sheep of Israel) and directed these teachings in a corrupted form to Non-Jews…As Jesus had not succeeded during his mission in converting the majority of his Jewish brothers and sister to his divinely inspired interpretations of Judaism, Paul ensured that after Jesus had departed, that Jews would not be temped to follow Jesus’ Teachings. To this end, Paul so adulterated Jesus’ life, purpose, mission and claims to make the new dogma (Paul’s version of Jesus’ teachings) repugnant to the Jews. (Farouk Hosein, Fundamentalism Revisited, Eniath’s Printing Company Trinidad, p. 49)

The Jewish Christians reacted strongly to Paul, they rejected his pagan ideas of the “divinity of Christ”, and they rejected the concept of the “divine sonship” of Jesus, whom they regarded as a Prophet and Messenger.

The Jewish Christians rejected Paul’s version of ‘Christ’, to them the ‘Christ’ was anointed and fully human. Many characters in the Bible were called ‘Christ’ (anointed) but they were never divine ‘god-men’. Paul changed the original meaning of this title to make it conform to the Gentile thinking. The Romans considered their Emperors to be the ‘sons of God’, or personages of the sun. Similarly, the Hindus consider their heroes to be the ‘incarnations’ of God.

“A true Jew would have immediately recognized the teaching of Jesus as a reaffirmation of what Moses had taught. But to many a pagan, it must have seemed new and strange and perhaps a little complicated. Most of the pagans still believed in a multitude of gods who, it was thought, mixed freely with human beings, mated with them, and took part in every sphere of human life. To the common people of Greece, any description of Jesus must have seemed like a description of one of their gods, and they were probably quite ready to accept Jesus in this capacity. There was always room for one more god. However, the actual teaching of Jesus negated all their gods, since it affirmed the Divine Unity”. (Muhammad Ataur-Raheem, Jesus: Prophet of Islam 1992 edition, p. 62)

Paul’s reasoning had two major consequences. It not only resulted in further changes being made to what Jesus had taught, but also prepared the way for completely changing people’s ideas of who Jesus was. He was being transformed from a man to a conception in people’s minds. Divinity had been attributed to Jesus even when he was on earth by some of those who marveled at his words and miracles, and who, mistakenly, considered him to be more than a prophet. Some of his enemies had also spread the rumor that he was the “son of God”, hoping to rouse the orthodox Jew’s anger against him for associating himself with God. Thus, even before he disappeared, there had been a tendency to obscure his true nature and ascribe godhood to Jesus. This imaginary figure of Christ, who apparently had the power to annul what Jesus had previously taught, was clearly no ordinary mortal, and, inevitably, became confused by many with God. Thus, this imaginary figure became an object of worship, and was associated with God. (Muhammad Ataur-Raheem, p. 70)

The great scholar Mawdudi alludes to the deification of Jesus by the “Christians”.

The false tendencies, born of centuries of deviations, ignorance and malpractice, now took another form. Though they accepted their Prophets during their lives and practiced their teachings, after their deaths they introduced their own distorted ideas into their religions. They adopted novel methods of worshipping God; some even took to the worship of their Prophets. They made the Prophets the incarnations of God or the sons of God; some associated their Prophets with God in His Divinity. (Towards Understanding Islam, p. 39)
Jesus taught Salvation comes through Faith and Works, Paul distorted it:

Jesus taught salvation is attained by keeping the commandments, physical prayer, fasting, and observing the Law of Moses. Paul neglected these commands and distorted the Path to Salvation preached by Jesus.

Paul said that “salvation comes through faith and grace” which is exactly what the missionaries are saying today. Let us read the words of Jesus.

Fasting is commanded:

Howbeit this kind goeth not out but by prayer and fasting. (Matthew 17:21)

And he said unto them, This kind can come forth by nothing, but by prayer and fasting. (Mark 9:29)

Now in the twenty and fourth day of this month the children of Israel were assembled with fasting, and with sackclothes, and earth upon them. (Nehemiah 9:1)

And in every province, whithersoever the king's commandment and his decree came, [there was] great mourning among the Jews, and fasting, and weeping, and wailing; and many lay in sackcloth and ashes. (Esther 4:3)

But as for me, when they were sick, my clothing [was] sackcloth: I humbled my soul with fasting; and my prayer returned into mine own bosom. (Psalms 35:13)

When I wept, [and chastened] my soul with fasting, that was to my reproach. (Psalms 69:10)

My knees are weak through fasting; and my flesh faileth of fatness. (Psalms 109:24)

Therefore also now, saith the LORD, turn ye [even] to me with all your heart, and with fasting, and with weeping, and with mourning: (Joel 2:12)

Christians do not fast, Muslims fast during the holy month of Ramadan, so they must be considered the true followers of Jesus. The (only) excuse Christians have for not fasting is echoing the teachings of Paul, who discarded these laws altogether!

‪Islam: The Religion Of Truth by Abdur Raheem Green‬‏ - YouTube

الخميس، 18 أغسطس 2011

Mohammad messaged you

‎"Thus saith the LORD of hosts, I remember that which Amalek did to Israel, how he laid wait for him in the way, when he came up from Egypt. Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass." (I Samuel 15:2-3)

الأربعاء، 17 أغسطس 2011

slavery in the bible

SLAVERY IN BIBLE :

Slaves, obey your earthly masters with deep respect and fear. Serve them sincerely as you would serve Christ. (Ephesians 6:5 NLT).......

When a man strikes his male or female slave with a rod so hard that the slave dies under his hand, he shall be punished. If, however, the slave survives for a day or two, he is not to be punished, since the slave is his own property. (Exodus 21:2...0-21 NAB).............

The servant will be severely punished, for though he knew his duty, he refused to do it. "But people who are not aware that they are doing wrong will be punished only lightly. Much is required from those to whom much is given, and much more is required from those to whom much more is given." (Luke 12:47-48 NLT).........

If you buy a Hebrew slave, he is to serve for only six years. Set him free in the seventh year, and he will owe you nothing for his freedom. If he was single when he became your slave and then married afterward, only he will go free in the seventh year. But if he was married before he became a slave, then his wife will be freed with him. If his master gave him a wife while he was a slave, and they had sons or daughters, then the man will be free in the seventh year, but his wife and children will still belong to his master. But the slave may plainly declare, 'I love my master, my wife, and my children. I would rather not go free.' If he does this, his master must present him before God. Then his master must take him to the door and publicly pierce his ear with an awl. After that, the slave will belong to his master forever. (Exodus 21:2-6 NLT)

Notice how they can get a male Hebrew slave to become a permanent slave by keeping his wife and children hostage until he says he wants to become a permanent slave. What kind of family values are these?........

When a man sells his daughter as a slave, she will not be freed at the end of six years as the men are. If she does not please the man who bought her, he may allow her to be bought back again. But he is not allowed to sell her to foreigners, since he is the one who broke the contract with her. And if the slave girl's owner arranges for her to marry his son, he may no longer treat her as a slave girl, but he must treat her as his daughter. If he himself marries her and then takes another wife, he may not reduce her food or clothing or fail to sleep with her as his wife. If he fails in any of these three ways, she may leave as a free woman without making any payment. (Exodus 21:7-11 NLT).....

They must be dividing the spoils they took: there must be a damsel or two for each man, Spoils of dyed cloth as Sisera's spoil, an ornate shawl or two for me in the spoil. (Judges 5:30 NAB)See More

الثلاثاء، 16 أغسطس 2011

no rich in heaven

Joe Love Gellani Eye of a needle - If Jesus said it's difficult, Even impossible, For a rich man to get in to the kingdom of heaven why do so many rich people believe in Jesus? why is it the goal of nearly every single christian to become rich? And why do TV evangelists always want your money?...

women in the quran

O ye who believe! Ye are forbidden to inherit women against their will. Nor should ye treat them with harshness, that ye may Take away part of the dower ye have given them,-except where they have been guilty of open lewdness; on the contrary live with them on a footing of kindness and equity. If ye take a dislike to them it may be that ye dislike a thing, and Allah brings about through it a great deal of good.

bible laws

Biblical Law - In Matthew 5:17-18 it states that Jesus wants Christians to follow the old testament word for word. Why don't they? And why do they actively disregard the parts of the old testament which they don't agree with or which are socially unacceptable these day, Like child slavery.....

stages of humn in the quran

) The Quran on Human Embryonic Development:

In the Holy Quran, God speaks about the stages of man’s embryonic development:

We created man from an extract of clay. Then We made him as a drop in a place of settlement, firmly fixed. Then We made the drop into an alaqah (leech, suspended thing, and blood clot), then We made the alaqah i...nto a mudghah (chewed substance)... 1 (Quran, 23:12-14)

Literally, the Arabic word alaqah has three meanings: (1) leech, (2) suspended thing, and (3) blood clot.

In comparing a leech to an embryo in the alaqah stage, we find similarity between the two2 as we can see in figure 1. Also, the embryo at this stage obtains nourishment from the blood of the mother, similar to the leech, which feeds on the blood of others.3

Figure 1: Drawings illustrating the similarities in appearance between a leech and a human embryo at the alaqah stage. (Leech drawing from Human Development as Described in the Quran and Sunnah, Moore and others, p. 37, modified from Integrated Principles of Zoology, Hickman and others. Embryo drawing from The Developing Human, Moore and Persaud, 5th ed., p. 73.)

The second meaning of the word alaqah is “suspended thing.” This is what we can see in figures 2 and 3, the suspension of the embryo, during the alaqah stage, in the womb of the mother.

Figure 2: We can see in this diagram the suspension of an embryo during the alaqah stage in the womb (uterus) of the mother. (The Developing Human, Moore and Persaud, 5th ed., p. 66.) (Click on the image to enlarge it.)

Figure 3: In this photomicrograph, we can see the suspension of an embryo (marked B) during the alaqah stage (about 15 days old) in the womb of the mother. The actual size of the embryo is about 0.6 mm. (The Developing Human, Moore, 3rd ed., p. 66, from Histology, Leeson and Leeson.)

The third meaning of the word alaqah is “blood clot.” We find that the external appearance of the embryo and its sacs during the alaqah stage is similar to that of a blood clot. This is due to the presence of relatively large amounts of blood present in the embryo during this stage4 (see figure 4). Also during this stage, the blood in the embryo does not circulate until the end of the third week.5 Thus, the embryo at this stage is like a clot of blood.

Figure 4: Diagram of the primitive cardiovascular system in an embryo during the alaqah stage. The external appearance of the embryo and its sacs is similar to that of a blood clot, due to the presence of relatively large amounts of blood present in the embryo. (The Developing Human, Moore, 5th ed., p. 65.) (Click on the image to enlarge it.)

So the three meanings of the word alaqah correspond accurately to the descriptions of the embryo at the alaqah stage.

The next stage mentioned in the verse is the mudghah stage. The Arabic word mudghah means “chewed substance.” If one were to take a piece of gum and chew it in his or her mouth and then compare it with an embryo at the mudghah stage, we would conclude that the embryo at the mudghah stage acquires the appearance of a chewed substance. This is because of the somites at the back of the embryo that “somewhat resemble teethmarks in a chewed substance.”6 (see figures 5 and 6).

Figure 5: Photograph of an embryo at the mudghah stage (28 days old). The embryo at this stage acquires the appearance of a chewed substance, because the somites at the back of the embryo somewhat resemble teeth marks in a chewed substance. The actual size of the embryo is 4 mm. (The Developing Human, Moore and Persaud, 5th ed., p. 82, from Professor Hideo Nishimura, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.)

Figure 6: When comparing the appearance of an embryo at the mudghah stage with a piece of gum that has been chewed, we find similarity between the two.

A) Drawing of an embryo at the mudghah stage. We can see here the somites at the back of the embryo that look like teeth marks. (The Developing Human, Moore and Persaud, 5th ed., p. 79.)

B) Photograph of a piece of gum that has been chewed.

(Click on the image to enlarge it.)

How could Muhammad have possibly known all this 1400 years ago, when scientists have only recently discovered this using advanced equipment and powerful microscopes which did not exist at that time? Hamm and Leeuwenhoek were the first scientists to observe human sperm cells (spermatozoa) using an improved microscope in 1677 (more than 1000 years after Muhammad ). They mistakenly thought that the sperm cell contained a miniature preformed human being that grew when it was deposited in the female genital tract.7

Professor Emeritus Keith L. Moore8 is one of the world’s most prominent scientists in the fields of anatomy and embryology and is the author of the book entitled The Developing Human, which has been translated into eight languages. This book is a scientific reference work and was chosen by a special committee in the United States as the best book authored by one person. Dr. Keith Moore is Professor Emeritus of Anatomy and Cell Biology at the University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. There, he was Associate Dean of Basic Sciences at the Faculty of Medicine and for 8 years was the Chairman of the Department of Anatomy. In 1984, he received the most distinguished award presented in the field of anatomy in Canada, the J.C.B. Grant Award from the Canadian Association of Anatomists. He has directed many international associations, such as the Canadian and American Association of Anatomists and the Council of the Union of Biological Sciences.

In 1981, during the Seventh Medical Conference in Dammam, Saudi Arabia, Professor Moore said: “It has been a great pleasure for me to help clarify statements in the Quran about human development. It is clear to me that these statements must have come to Muhammad from God, because almost all of this knowledge was not discovered until many centuries later. This proves to me that Muhammad must have been a messenger of God.”9 (To view the RealPlayer video of this comment click here ).

Consequently, Professor Moore was asked the following question: “Does this mean that you believe that the Quran is the word of God?” He replied: “I find no difficulty in accepting this.”10

During one conference, Professor Moore stated: “....Because the staging of human embryos is complex, owing to the continuous process of change during development, it is proposed that a new system of classification could be developed using the terms mentioned in the Quran and Sunnah (what Muhammad said, did, or approved of). The proposed system is simple, comprehensive, and conforms with present embryological knowledge. The intensive studies of the Quran and hadeeth (reliably transmitted reports by the Prophet Muhammad’s companions of what he said, did, or approved of) in the last four years have revealed a system for classifying human embryos that is amazing since it was recorded in the seventh century A.D. Although Aristotle, the founder of the science of embryology, realized that chick embryos developed in stages from his studies of hen’s eggs in the fourth century B.C., he did not give any details about these stages. As far as it is known from the history of embryology, little was known about the staging and classification of human embryos until the twentieth century. For this reason, the descriptions of the human embryo in the Quran cannot be based on scientific knowledge in the seventh century. The only reasonable conclusion is: these descriptions were revealed to Muhammad from God. He could not have known such details because he was an illiterate man with absolutely no scientific training.”11 (View the RealPlayer video of this comment ).

Next: The Quran on Mountains

_____________________________

Footnotes:

(1) Please note that what is between these special brackets ... in this web site is only a translation of the meaning of the Quran. It is not the Quran itself, which is in Arabic.

(2) The Developing Human, Moore and Persaud, 5th ed., p. 8.

(3) Human Development as Described in the Quran and Sunnah, Moore and others, p. 36.

(4) Human Development as Described in the Quran and Sunnah, Moore and others, pp. 37-38.

(5) The Developing Human, Moore and Persaud, 5th ed., p. 65.

(6) The Developing Human, Moore and Persaud, 5th ed., p. 8.

(7) The Developing Human, Moore and Persaud, 5th ed., p. 9.

(8) Note: The occupations of all the scientists mentioned in this web site were last updated in 1997.

(9) The reference for this saying is This is the Truth (videotape). For a copy of this videotape, please visit this page.

(10) This is the Truth (videotape).

(11) This is the Truth (videotape). For a copy, see footnote no. 9

growest relgion

At the end of this chapter, it may be appropriate to point out an important indication of the truth of Islam. It is well known that in the USA and the whole world, Islam is the fastest-growing religion. The following are some observations on this phenomenon:

n “Islam is the fastest-growing religion in America, a guide and pillar of stability for many of our people...” (Hillary Rodham Clinton, Los Angeles Times).1

n “Moslems are the world’s fastest-growing group...” (The Population Reference Bureau, USA Today).2

n “....Islam is the fastest-growing religion in the country.” (Geraldine Baum; Newsday Religion Writer, Newsday).3

n “Islam, the fastest-growing religion in the United States...” (Ari L. Goldman, New York Times).4

This phenomenon indicates that Islam is truly a religion from God. It is unreasonable to think that so many Americans and people from different countries have converted to Islam without careful consideration and deep contemplation before concluding that Islam is true. These converts have come from different countries, classes, races, and walks of life. They include scientists, professors, philosophers, journalists, politicians, actors, and athletes. (To read the stories of people who have converted to Islam, please visit the links at Stories of New Muslims.)

The points mentioned in this chapter constitute only some of the evidence supporting the belief that the Quran is the literal word of God, that Muhammad is truly a prophet sent by God, and that Islam is truly a religion from God.

losers

[103] Say (O Muhammad (peace be upon him)) "Shall We tell you the greatest losers in respect of (their) deeds?[104] "Those whose efforts have been wasted in this life while they thought that they were acquiring good by their deeds![105] "They are those who deny the Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) of their Lord and the Meeting with Him (in the Hereafter). So their works are in vain, and on the Day of Resurrection, We shall not give them any weight.[106] "That shall be their recompense, Hell; because they disbelieved and took My Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) and My Messengers by way of jest and mockery.

angels stronger than jesus

How to be stronger than the angel of His divinity?!

why not is God manifest in the flesh? What strengthens the need for owners?

This is what Luke's Gospel 22 Number 43 ((and away from them a distance of almost a stone's throw, and knelt down to pray 42, saying: Father, if You away from me this cup. But, not my will but yours. And appeared to him an angel from heaven to strengthen him. While he was in the conflict, taking pray in the strongest urgency; race became even drops of blood falling down on the ground.)) call was even save him from his Lord Steel.

Human being carries within it the theology of God needs then to the owners to strengthen him?

Where is the wise?

How can Jesus be the full divinity to become weak and needs to be strengthened him from!

jesus death

How Was JESUS Crucified ?

On a Cross (Mat)

On a Tree (Peter)

...

Was Not Crucified (Quran 4:157)

Jesus Was Not Crucified (Quran 4:157)

And [for] their saying, "Indeed, we have killed the Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, the messenger of Allah ." And they did not kill him, nor did they crucify him; but [another] was made to resemble him to them. And indeed, those who differ over it are in doubt about it. They have no knowledge of it except the following of assumption. And they did not kill him, for certain.

jesus mircles in the quran

The Qur’an tells us a lot of wonderful things about Jesus.

As a result, believers in the Qur’an love Jesus, honour him, and believe in him. In fact, no Muslim can be a Muslim unless he or she believes in Jesus, on whom be peace.

The Qur’an says that Jesus was born of a virgin, that he spoke while he was still only a baby, that he healed the blind and the leper by allah leave, and that he raised the dead by allah leave

jesus never killed in the quran

They Killed Him Not Nor Crucified Him

Qur'an 4:155-159 Surah An-Nisaa (The Women)

(They have incurred divine displeasure): in that they broke their Covenant: that they rejected the Signs of Allah; that they slew the Messengers in defiance of right; that they said "Our hearts are the wrappings (which preserve Allah's Word; we need no more)"; nay Allah hath set the seal on their hearts for their blasphemy and little is it they believe.

That they rejected faith: that they uttered against Mary a grave false charge.

That they said (in boast) "We killed Christ (Maseeh) Jesus the son of Mary the Apostle of Allah"; but they killed him not nor crucified him but so it was made to appear to them and those who differ therein are full of doubts with no (certain) knowledge but only conjecture to follow for of a surety they killed him not.

Nay Allah raised him up unto Himself; and Allah is Exalted in Power Wise.

And there is none of the People of the Book but must believe in him before his death; and on the Day of Judgment He will be a witness against them

moses rape in the bible

As shown in the quotes below:

"....The Tannaïtic Midrash Sifre to Numbers in §157 comments on the above quoted commandment of MOSES to kill the Midianite women as well as the male children...."

"....According to the Tannaïte Rabbis, MOSES therefore had ordered the Israelites to kill all women older than three years and a day, because they were "suitable for having sexual relations." [138]...."

"Said Rabbi Joseph, "Come and take note: A girl three years and one day old is betrothed by intercourse....."

"A girl three years and one day old is betrothed by intercourse. "A girl three years old may be betrothed through an act of sexual intercourse," the words of R. Meir. And sages say, "Three years and one day old..."

relgion is choice

There is no compulsion in religion. Verily, the Right Path has become distinct from the wrong path. Whoever disbelieves in Evil and believes in Allâh, then he has grasped the most trustworthy handhold that will never break. And Allâh is All-Hearer, All-Knower.

Quran (2, 256)

Whoever works righteousness, whether male or female, while he (or she) is a true believer verily, to him We will give a good & pure life (in this world with respect) and We will bestow on such their reward according to the best of their actions (i.e. Paradise in the Hereafter).

Quran(16, 97)

jesus follow quran

Jesus Christ (pbuh), following both the Gospels and the Qur’an, was born of the virgin Mary, who was just like any other human being. It is common knowledge that whoever is born cannot be deified. Jesus Christ was a human being who used to eat and drink just like anybody else. He was susceptible to hunger, grief and/or merriment. He experienced all the paraphernalia pertaining to human life. His miraculous creation from no father is no stranger than that of Adam, a being who was both fatherless and motherless. This is an evidence of God’s omnipotence. Jesus Christ was no more than a servant to, and messenger of God, who revealed the scripture in order to promulgate it and carry out His call. On the day of judgement Jesus Christ is not to be judged because of those who deified him in exclusion of God or thought of him as parallel. In the Qur’an we have a mentioning of this, where in the hereafter God will ask Jesus if he had asked his followers to deify him, whereby Jesus will answer God by saying: “If you punish them, they are your slaves, and if you forgive them, verily, you, only you, are the all-Mighty, the all-Wise” (Holy Qur’an: 5: 118). Here is one more reply to the one who seeks an evidence as to the deification of Jesus Christ, while he has none of the qualities of God. Whatever miracles he performed emanated from God, just as He supported other prophets.

all meassngers from allh were muslim

Morsy Aboelfwares There is no doubt that all prophets (peace be upon them), beginning with Adam and ending in Muhammad, preached one religion—the worship of allah alone and disregarding all other powers. This is something advocated by Islam. allah says: “Truly..., the true religion with allah is Islam” (Holy Qur’an: 3: 19). About Abraham (pbuh), God says: “Abraham was neither a Jew nor a Christian, but was a true Muslim (hanif: monotheist—a worshipper one God alone) and he was not a mushrik—a polytheist” (Holy Qur’an: 3: 67). On the question of the disciples of Jesus, allah says: “And when I (allah) inspired al-hawariun (the disciples of Jesus) to believe in Me and My Messenger, they said: ‘We believe. And bear witness that we are Muslims’.” (Holy Qur’an: 5: 111). Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) confirmed this in his saying: “Prophets are paternal brothers; their mothers are different, but their religion is one.

peace of jesus

Matthew 10:34-39

“Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law; and one’s foes will be members of one’s own household. Whoever loves father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; and whoever loves son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me; and whoever does not take up the cross and follow me is not worthy of me. Those who find their life will lose it, and those who lose their life for my sake will find it."

If Jesus was so peaceful, what does this verse mean?

الاثنين، 15 أغسطس 2011

was jesus birth from women?

IS GOD BORN OF A WOMAN ?

The gospel of Thomas 15 says:

Jesus said: When you see one who was NOT born of woman, prostrate yourselves onto your faces and worship him; that one is your father.

In Galatians 4.4-5 Paul says:

But, when the fulness of time came, God sent forth his son, made OF a woman, made under the law, in order to redeem those under the law,……

In Job 14:1 says:

Man that is born OF a woman is of few days, and full of trouble.( job 14:1)

So was Jesus was born of a woman and short lived and had a troubled life...so he cannot be God

New test is mainly based on personal letters thoughts and grudges between church fathers, bishops , popes, historians. Such as Irenaeus , Herodutous, Clements Tertullian Marcions…accusing each other of omissions and lies. An example of that is Tertullian on Marcion , he writes :
“Let the sponge of Marcion be ashamed of itself; except that it is superfluous for me to discuss the passages he has LEFT OUT…”
skipping the phrases about the son being made OF a woman
The Dead Sea Scrolls:
1QS: “The Community Rule”: 11.20-21: “Who can endure Thy glory, and what is the son of man in the midst of Thy wonderful deeds? What shall one born of woman be accounted before Thee? Kneaded from the dust, his abode is the nourishment of worms” (TCDSSIE:117).
Christians think Jesus is God, Son of God and portion of the Trinity with the holy spirit ( Gabriel) at one and the exact same time. Their perception is founded by 4 of the 12 disciples John, Matthew, Luke and Mark.

birth of jesus

How Mary Conceived and Delivered "God". Mary conceived Jesus like any other woman: "The days were accomplished that she should be delivered," (Luke, 2:6) which means that she went through all the normal stages of pregnancy. Nor was her delivery any different from other expectant mothers: "And she being with child cried, travelling in birth, and pained to be delivered." (Revelation, 12:2)

mercy in the quran

take not life, which Allah hath made sacred, except by way of justice and law: thus doth He command you, that ye may learn wisdom.

وَلا تَقْتُلُوا النَّفْسَ الَّتِي حَرَّمَ اللَّهُ إِلاّ بِالْحَقِّ ذَلِكُمْ وَصَّاكُمْ بِهِ لَعَلَّكُمْ تَعْقِلُونَ (151

فَإِنِ انْتَهَوْا فَلَا عُدْوَانَ إِلَّا عَلَى الظَّالِمِينَ

(البقرة 193).

Let there be no hostility except to those who practise oppression.

________________________________________

وَقٰتِلوا فى سَبيلِ اللَّهِ الَّذينَ يُقٰتِلونَكُم وَلا تَعتَدوا ۚ إِنَّ اللَّهَ لا يُحِبُّ المُعتَدينَ ﴿١٩٠﴾

Fight in the cause of Allah those who fight you, but do not transgress limits; for Allah loveth not transgressors.

ادعُ إِلىٰ سَبيلِ رَبِّكَ بِالحِكمَةِ وَالمَوعِظَةِ الحَسَنَةِ ۖ وَجٰدِلهُم بِالَّتى هِىَ أَحسَنُ ۚ إِنَّ رَبَّكَ هُوَ أَعلَمُ بِمَن ضَلَّ عَن سَبيلِهِ ۖ وَهُوَ أَعلَمُ بِالمُهتَدينَ﴿١٢٥﴾

Invite (all) to the Way of thy Lord with wisdom and beautiful preaching; and argue with them in ways that are best and most gracious: for thy Lord knoweth best, who have strayed from His Path, and who receive guidance

فَاصفَح عَنهُم وَقُل سَلٰمٌ ۚ فَسَوفَ يَعلَمونَ ﴿٨٩﴾

But turn away from them, and say "Peace!" But soon shall they know!

خُذِ العَفوَ وَأمُر بِالعُرفِ وَأَعرِض عَنِ الجٰهِلينَ ﴿١٩٩﴾

Hold to forgiveness; command what is right; But turn away from the ignorant.

فَبِما نَقضِهِم ميثٰقَهُم لَعَنّٰهُم وَجَعَلنا قُلوبَهُم قٰسِيَةً ۖ يُحَرِّفونَ الكَلِمَ عَن مَواضِعِهِ ۙ وَنَسوا حَظًّا مِمّا ذُكِّروا بِهِ ۚ وَلا تَزالُ تَطَّلِعُ عَلىٰ خائِنَةٍ مِنهُم إِلّا قَليلًا مِنهُم ۖ فَاعفُ عَنهُم وَاصفَح ۚ إِنَّ اللَّهَ يُحِبُّ المُحسِنينَ﴿١٣﴾

"There has already been for you a Sign in the two armies that met (in combat): One was fighting in the cause of Allah, the other resisting Allah. these saw with their own eyes Twice their number. But Allah doth support with His aid whom He pleaseth. In this is a warning for such as have eyes to see."

وقد قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم -مبينًا الغرض الأساسي من بعثته النبوية السامية-: (إنما بُعثت لأتمم مكارم الأخلاق)

ومكارم الأخلاق هذه هي الأساس في حفظ حقوق الآخرين، وعدم الاعتداء، وسلامة المجتمع، ومن ثم التقليل من الخسائر بما يضمن للآخرين التعايش بالصورة الإنسانية الصحيحة.

وفي الحرب ضرب الرسولُ الكريم أروعَ المثل على الرحمة والعدل والتفضل ومراعاة أعلى آدابها الإنسانية؛ ففي قتاله لا يَغدر ولا يفسد ولا يَقتل امرأة أو شيخًا أو طفلا، ولا يَتبع مُدبرا، ولا يُجهز على جريح، ولا يُمثِل بقتيل، ولا يسيء إلى أسير، ولا يلطم وجها، ولا يتعرض لمسالم.

فمن وصايا النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم لأمراء السرايا والجيوش:

فعن بريدة رضي الله عنه قال: كان رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم إذا أمّر أميرًا على جيش أو سرية أوصاه في خاصته بتقوى الله عز وجل وبمن معه من المسلمين خيرًا ثم قال: (اغزوا باسم الله في سبيل الله، قاتلوا من كفر بالله، اغزوا ولا تغُلّوا ولا تغدروا)

ويقول صلى الله عليه وسلم: (إن الغادر يُنصب له لواءٌ يوم القيامة فيُقال: هذه غَدْرة فلان بن فلان)

وقال صلى الله عليه وسلم: (لكل غادرٍ لواء يوم القيامة يُعرف به)

وقال أيضًا: (لا تقتلوا ذرية ولا عسيفًا) ولا تقتلوا أصحاب الصوامع)

وقد رأى الرسول صلى الله عليه وسلم في إحدى الغزوات (غزوة حنين) امرأة مقتولة فغضب وقال: (ما كانت هذه تُقاتِل)

ولا شك في أن النهي عن قتل الضعفاء، أو الذين لم يشاركوا في القتال، كالرهبان، والنساء، والشيوخ، والأطفال، أو الذين أجبروا على القتال، كالفلاحين، والأجراء (العمال) شيء تفرد به الإسلام في تاريخ الحروب في العالم، فما عهد قبل الإسلام ولا بعده حتى اليوم مثل هذا التشريع الفريد المليء بالرحمة والإنسانية، فلقد كان من المعهود والمسلّم به عند جميع الشعوب أن الحروب تبيح للأمة المحاربة قتل جميع فئات الشعب من أعدائها المحاربين بلا استثناء

فحياة الإنسان لدى النبي الكريم مصونة لا يجوز التعرض لها بالترويع أو الضرب أو السجن أو الجلد

فعلى أساس احترام النفس الإنسانية كان الرسول صلى الله عليه وسلم يربي أصحابه

والرسول صلى الله عليه وسلم يوفي بالعهود والوعود التي يقطعها على نفسه، ويشدد على نفسه إلى أقصى مدى حقنا للدماء.

وما أروعَ قولَ الرسول صلى الله عليه وسلم يوم الحديبية: "والله لا تدْعوني قريشٌ إلى خُطَّة توصل بها الأرحام، وتعظم فيها الحُرُمات إلا أعطيتهم إياها"

The Messenger of Allah peace be upon him - indicating the primary purpose of the prophetic mission of the High Commissioner: - (I was sent to complete good morals)

And morals this is the basis for the preservation of the rights of others, and non-aggression, and community safety, and then reduce the losses to ensure the coexistence of other human right image.

In the war hit the Holy Prophet the finest example of the compassion, justice and kindly, and taking into account the higher literature of humanity; In the fight does not betray it does not invalidate does not kill the woman or old man or child, do not follow a deliberate, not equipped with a wounded, and does not represent Baktil, not detrimental to the prisoner, and slugging face, are not subject to peaceful.

It is the commandments of the Prophet peace be upon him for the princes and armies Saraya:

It was narrated that Buraydah may Allah be pleased with him said: The Messenger of Allah peace be upon him if was healed, the army or secret advised him in his fear of Allah Almighty and including Muslims who better, then he said: (invade in the name of God in the way of Allah, they fought them so that invade do not boil or Ngdroa)

He says peace be upon him: (The treacherous focus his banner on the Day of Resurrection will be said: This is treachery So and so)

He said peace be upon him: (for each left the brigade known as the Day of Resurrection it)

He also said: (Do not kill any children or Asiva) do not kill the owners of silos)

He saw the Prophet peace be upon him in one of the invasions (Battle of nostalgia) a murdered woman became angry and said: (What was the fight)

There is no doubt that the prohibition on killing the weak, or who did not participate in the fighting, Kalrhban, women, elders, children, or who were forced to fight, peasants, and wage earners (workers) something the uniqueness of Islam in the history of wars in the world, what era before Islamor after the date of such legislation unique is full of mercy and humanity, has been entrusted with and accepted by all peoples, the wars allowing a belligerent nation, killing all classes of people from their enemies combatants, without exception,

Rights in the lives of the Holy Prophet shall not be permissible exposure intimidation or beatings, imprisonment or skin

On the basis of respect for the human soul was the Prophet peace be upon him raising his friends

And the Prophet, peace be upon him Yoffie covenants and promises of the same, and stresses the same to the fullest extent of the bloodshed.

How great words of the Prophet peace be upon him on Hudaybiyah: "God does not call me Quraish to plan reached by the ties of kinship, and maximize the privacy but I have given them"

fChrist (pbuh) cannot be said to have failed in his mission

Christ (pbuh) cannot be said to have failed in his mission. God supported him with astounding miracle and convincing arguments. Whatever distortion has befallen the scripture preached by Christ, it must have happened after his ascention to heaven. Failure and disintegration are the works of the followes who fell a prey to whims and... caprice. In this connection God says:

[And (remember) when God will say (on the day of reurrection): ‘O Jesus, son of Mary! Did you say unto men: ‘worship me and my mother as two gods besides God?’ He will say: ‘Glory is to You! It is not for me to say what I had no right (to say). Had I said such a thing, You would surely, have know it. You know what is in my inner-self though I do not know what is in Yours; truly You, only You, are the All-Knower of all that is hidden (and seen). Never did I say to them aught except what You (God) did command me to say: worship God my Lord and your Lord. And I was a witness over them while I dwelt amongst them, but when you took me up, You were the Watcher over them; and You are a Witness to all things’.”] (Holy Qur’an: 5: 116-117)

orgnal sin

ESV translation of the said verse:

Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, and in sin did my mother conceive me.

As you can see for yourself, this verse is not teaching the Original Sin, it seems to be about the sinful act of adultery yielding a child; the Psalm is thought to be a projection upon the future child of an adulterous relationship.

However, the NIV translation does seem to teach a branch of the Original Sin (i.e. babies are with sin):

Surely I was sinful at birth, sinful from the time my mother conceived me.

So which translation is correct?

Firstly, if the NIV translation (the one teaching Original Sin) is correct then the Bible-believing Christians will have contradictions on their hands. The verses mentioned in the opening article on the topic of Original Sin (Ezekiel 8:4 and 20, 2 Kings 14:6) would be deemed as contradicting Psalm 51:5, thus further discrediting the Bible.

However, in my research of Psalm 51:5 I have found three more verses (from the OT) which seem to refute the idea of Original Sin. The first two go together(Jeremiah 3:25 and Genesis 8:21); they appear to indicate a human only becomes sinful from his/her youth, i.e. at the time of discernment between right and wrong (good and evil). In fact Jeremiah 3:25 indicates humans sin from their youth onwards, thus the idea of Original Sin upon babies seems to be in real question here.

This age of discernment between good and evil appears to be mentioned in Isaiah 7:15-16 as well.

The NIV translation seems to be in error and appears to be unfaithful as the NASB, ESV and KJV all disagree with the NIV translation. The three aforementioned translations all indicate the child was conceived in sin UNLIKE the NIV which suggests the child was sinful at the time of birth.

New American Standard Bible (NASB):

Behold, I was (A)brought forth in iniquity,And in sin my mother conceived me.

King James Version (KJV):

Behold, I was shapen in iniquity; and in sin did my mother conceive me

English Standard Version (ESV):

Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, and in sin did my mother conceive me.

So there is NO teaching of Original Sin in this verse! The verse is concerning the sin of adultery; it does not mean the child is born with sin. In fact the verse does not make mention of Adam's sin.

(Copied)

paryer of jesus

Almighty God doesn’t pray to anyone. Jesus [Peace Be Upon Him] did and said others to do the same.

Like every prophet ,Jesus [PBUH] prayed to Almighty God and said others to do the same

Matthew 26:39

...

Going a little farther, he fell with his face to the ground and prayed, “My Father, if it is possible, may this cup be taken from me. Yet not as I will, but as you will.”

Luke 11:1-4

One day Jesus was praying in a certain place. When he finished, one of his disciples said to him, “Lord, teach us to pray, just as John taught his disciples.”

He said to them, “When you pray, say:

“‘Father hallowed be your name,

your kingdom come.

3 Give us each day our daily bread.

4 Forgive us our sins,

for we also forgive everyone who sins against us.

And lead us not into temptation.

It is Mentioned in Matthew 6:6

But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.

It is Mentioned in Mark 11:25

And when you stand praying, if you hold anything against anyone, forgive him, so that your Father in heaven may forgive you your sins.

‘Worship the Lord your God, and serve him only. [Matthew 4:10]

’Worship the Lord your God and serve him only.’ [Luke 4:8]

why urs worship jesus if jesus worship god

which bible and which church?

Which Bible ? What Church – Denomination? ………………….JESUS May Select in his Second Coming to the World ?????????????????

Christian Churches & Major Denominations

(38,000 Different faith groups among the Christian world according to the latest report.)

Please Select The Right One? And the straight Right Path ?

Catholic Church

Eastern Orthodox Church

Oriental Orthodox Church

Church of the East (Assyrian)

Pre-Lutheran Protestants

Lutheranism

Anglicanism

Presbyterianism

Congregationalist Churches

Anabaptists

Brethren

Methodists

Pietists and Holiness Churches

Baptists

Apostolic Churches – Irvingites

Pentecostalism

Charismatics

African Initiated Churches

United and uniting churches

Religious Society of Friends (Quakers)

Stone-Campbell Restoration Movement

Southcottites

Millerites and comparable groups

British-Israelism

Christian Revival Church

"Original" denomination

"Prairie Saint" denominations

Rocky Mountains denominations

Oneness Pentecostalism

Unitarianism and Universalism

Bible Student groups

Swedenborgianism

Messianic Judaism

Jewish Christians

Esoteric Christianity

New Thought Denomination

Syncretistic religions incorporating elements of Christianity

This is not a complete list, but aims to provide a comprehensible overview of the diversity among denominations (Vast difference in faith and Beliefs) of Christianity. As there are reported to be approximately 38,000 Christian denominations

Holy Quran Says:

And indeed, Jesus will be [a sign for] knowledge of the Hour, so be not in doubt of it, and follow Me. This is a straight path.(43:61)

Which one is the straight path among all ?????????

(43:3) verily We have made it an Arabic Qur’an that you may understand. *1

*1 The object of taking an oath by the Qur'an is to impress this fact: "We are the Author of this Book and not Muhammad (upon whom be Allah's peace)," and the attribute of the Qur'an chosen for the oath is that it is a "lucid Book". To swear by the Qur'an itself with its this attribute in order to impress that the Qur'an is Divine Word by itself implies this: "O people, this is an open Book before you. Read it intelligently. Its clear and un-ambiguous themes, its language and literary style, its teaching which distinguishes the truth from falsehood, all arc testifying to the fact that none but the Lord of the Universe could be its Author.

Please comment with original authentic scriptural evidence alone? As man’s word are empty in front of the scriptural evidence

Lies upon Lies on crucifixion of Jesus!

Lies upon Lies on crucifixion of Jesus!

Plenty of Prophesies in the Old Testament about the Messiah getting saved from crucifixion

The following Biblical verses that further refute the crucifixion and resurrection lies according to the teachings of certain books in the Bible

Following verses of the Bible confirms Jesus Christ was being lifted and saved: (Also the following verses satisfies the teachings of Islam and its message in the Quran)

Luke 4:10-12

10 For the Scriptures say, ‘He will order his angels to protect and guard you.

11 And they will hold you up with their hands so you won’t even hurt your foot on a stone.’”

12 Jesus responded, “The Scriptures also say, ‘You must not test the Lord your God.’”

Matthew 4:5-10

5 Then the devil took him to the holy city, Jerusalem, to the highest point of the Temple,

6 and said, “If you are the Son of God, jump off! For the Scriptures say, ‘He (Almighty) will order his angels to protect you. And they will hold you up with their hands so you won’t even hurt your foot on a stone.’”

7 Jesus responded, “The Scriptures also say, ‘You must not test the Lord your God.’”

8 Next the devil took him to the peak of a very high mountain and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their glory.

10 “Get out of here, Satan,” Jesus told him. “For the Scriptures say, ‘you must worship the Lord your God (Almighty) and serve only him.’”

★ GLOBAL ISLAM

‎"Do they not then consider the Qur'an carefully? Had it been from other than Allah, they would surely have found therein much contradiction and error."
[Qur'an, An-Nisa 4:82]

Islam & Science (1)

الأحد، 14 أغسطس 2011

Did Saaib dodge any questions. My discussion with a Christian. (1)

Mishary Alafasi

السبت، 13 أغسطس 2011

‪English Translation of Chapter 57. Al Hadid (Iron) Of The Glorious Qur'an (Part 1)‬‏ - YouTube

الجمعة، 12 أغسطس 2011

Galilee, to the mountain where Jesus had told them to go. 17 When they saw him, they worshiped him; but some doubted. 18 Then Jesus came to them and said, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. 19 Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20 and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age

I can of Myself do nothing. As I hear, I judge; and My judgment is righteous, because I do not seek My own will but the will of the Father who sent Me." [John 5:30]
"I tell you the truth, no servant is greater than his master, nor is a messenger greater than the one who sent him."[John 13:16]

Do not argue with the people of the Book unless in a fair way, apart from those who act wrongly, and say to them: "We believe what has been sent down to us, and we believe what has been sent down to you. Our God and your God is one, and to Him we submit."

الخميس، 11 أغسطس 2011

GuideUS TV Channel - Watch LIVE

EditWebsites for Answering allegations against Islam
1) http://www.answering-christianity.com/ac.htm

2 ) http://www.call-to-monotheism.com/

3) http://www.letmeturnthetables.com/p/complete-list-of-articles.html

4) http://www.muslim-responses.com/

5) http://www.systemoflife.com/answering-islamophobes

6) http://www.load-islam.com/wel_islam.php?topic_id=2

7) http://www.islaminfo.com/ (Shabbir ally's website)

8) http://www.islamic-awareness.org/

9) http://islamic-replies.ucoz.com/

10) http://islamlife.com/religion2/articles/rebuttals-on-attakcs-on-islam

11) http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/

12) http://theinimitablequran.com/ (*Excellent site shows y quran can't be challenged*)

14) http://www.ilovezakirnaik.com/

15) http://www.islamdenouncesterrorism.com/

16) http://www.islam101.com/terror/

17) http://www.invitationtothetruth.com/

18) http://www.ahmed-deedat.co.za/ (Ahmed Deedat official site

Do you call Jesus The LORD ?
“Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven” (Mathew 7:21)

FALSE PROOFS OF EVOLUTION - 1

INTRODUCTION

Although the theory of evolution has been utterly discredited in every field of science, there have been determined efforts to keep it alive, for various ideological reasons, for over the last 150 years.

An examination of evolutionist literature shows how the evidence evolutionists have produced, in support of their theory, has subsequently either emerged to be fraudulent or else, scientifically invalid.

Even some leading evolutionists now agree on the fact that evolution possesses no tangible scientific evidence, and that the supposed proofs produced to date are all invalid and unscientific.

There are so many admissions regarding the invalidity of the theory of evolution made by evolutionists that they could fill several volumes of books.

Yet the theory of evolution continues to receive the support that it has failed to receive from science, from various ideological circles and part of the media, which has assumed the responsibility for propagating these circles’ propaganda.

These circles still impose the false and misleading evidence that even evolutionists have removed from the literature and which have been left with absolutely no validity, on society in press and media organs, as if they still represented scientific reality.

Their aim is to turn people away from the fact that God created them, and thus convince them to the lie that they are individuals which came into being by chance and descended from apes.

The aim is thus to produce large masses of people, stripped of all moral and spiritual values, unaware, unbelieving and dehumanized, who can easily be led in the direction desired by certain centers of power.

We need to have a sound knowledge of the true nature of the theory of evolution and the kinds of false evidence on which it is built in order to not be deceived by these circles with their ulterior motives.

In this film we will be examining just some of the false and misleading evidence and deceptions that some evolutionists have come up with in order to lead people astray over the course of the last 100 years or so.

THE “PILTDOWN MAN” HOAX

In 1912, a team led by a British amateur paleontologist by the name of Charles Dawson discovered a fossil, the jaw of which exhibited ape-like characteristics, although the cranium itself had human features.

The fossil was given the name Piltdown man and was exhibited as definitive proof of evolution in the world’s best-known museums over the following 40 years.

The fossil possessed a number of very interesting features.

Although the cranium had quite a large volume, its jaw resembled that of an orangutan, on which were two molar teeth, again similar to those in human beings.

These characteristics stunned the scientific world.

A scientific classification – Eoanthropus dawsoni - was soon produced for this fossil, which began being referred to as Piltdown Man.

It was estimated to be around 500,000 years old.

It was, thus, depicted as supposed evidence for the claim that human beings and apes are descended from a common ancestor.

An air of rejoice immediately began dominating the evolutionist press.

The impact of the fossil on the world of paleontology was truly enormous.

So enormous that some 500 doctoral theses would be written about it over the next 40 years until it was understood to be a hoax.

This fossil, which symbolized the alleged victory of evolution, was put on display in the British Museum, one of the most famous in the world.

It was examined not only by famous scientists from all over the world, but also by countless visitors. But, Piltdown Man’s victory was to be short-lived.

In 1949, Kenneth Oakley from the British Museum’s Paleontology Department developed a new method of determining the age of fossils.

He began using this technique, to which he gave the name of the fluoride test, on the fossils in the museum.

Oakley was stunned by the reality of what the test results revealed about the Piltdown Man skull. The jawbone contained no fluoride; there was very little in the cranium.

This meant that the jawbone was just a few years old, and the skull was a few hundred years old at most.

As the investigations intensified, an enormous reality emerged: the fossil that was once the best-known proof of evolution was actually a hoax!

The jawbone belonged to a recently deceased orangutan, and the cranium to a human being who had died some 500 years previously.

On close examination, it could be seen that the teeth had been subsequently attached to the jaw and abraded using steel tools. Finally, it had been dipped in a solution of potassium dichromate in order to give it an ancient appearance.

Detailed analyses by Joseph Weiner definitively proved that the fossil was a hoax.

Le Gros Clark, a professor of anatomy from Oxford University, was one of those scientists who revealed the fraud.

At the end of his investigations, he said:

Indeed so obvious did they [the scratches] seem it may well be asked -- how was it that they had escaped notice before? … They had never been looked for ... nobody previously had examined the Piltdown jaw with the idea of a possible forgery in mind, a deliberate fabrication.

All the time and effort that scientists had put into examining and interpreting the fossil had been devoted to an expertly manufactured hoax. Professor of anthropology Clark Howell made the following comment:

Piltdown was discovered in 1953 to have been nothing more than an Ape's jaw placed with a human skull. It was a hoax placed on purpose. They recognized neither the jaw to be an ape's or the skull to be a human's. Instead, they declared each part as an in between of ape and human. They dated it to be 500,000 years old, gave it a name (Eoanthropus Dawsoni or `Dawn Man'), and wrote some 500 books on it. The `discovery' fooled paleontologists for forty-five years.

HAECKEL’S FAKE ILLUSTRATIONS

A most famed of the supposed pieces of evidence proposed by evolutionists was the deceptive scheme of embryo development drawn up by the evolutionist biologist, Ernst Haeckel.

Darwin had asked Haeckel, a close friend of his, to contribute to his theory by telling him that he would have performed a great work by disseminating the evolutionary doctrine.

Haeckel did not turn down this request, and came up with a fictitious thesis in order to establish evidence in favor of evolution.

He called this, “the theory of recapitulation.”

According to this thesis, during the developmental stage living embryos undergo a short repetition of the “evolutionary process” that species supposedly underwent.

For example, a human embryo in the mother’s womb first exhibited fish and then reptile features, before finally turning into a human being.

However, observations and research in modern laboratories showed that all the illustrations produced by Haeckel in order to back this theory up were fake.

In its September 5, 1997 edition, the famous journal, Science, published an article titled, "Haeckel's Embryos: Fraud Rediscovered." This is what was stated:

Not only did Haeckel add or omit features, Richardson and his colleagues report, but he also fudged the scale to exaggerate similarities among species, even when there were 10-fold differences in size. Haeckel further blurred differences by neglecting to name the species in most cases, as if one representative was accurate for an entire group of animals. … "It [Haeckel's drawing] looks like it's turning out to be one of the most famous fakes in biology," Richardson concludes.

The magazine, New Scientist, noted this on the subject on October 16, 1999:

In fact Haeckel's strict law was soon shown to be incorrect. For instance, the early human embryo never has functioning gills like a fish, and never passes through stages that look like an adult reptile or monkey.

Haeckel’s deception went even further. That part of the embryo, which Haeckel equated with the yolk sac, was actually a sac that produced blood for the baby. The part that he claimed was a tail was subsequently realized to be the human backbone, which resembled a tail because it appeared before the legs.

Most interestingly, 100 years before he personally admitted that the illustrations he had produced in order to support his fictitious thesis were actually fakes:

After this compromising confession of 'forgery' I should be obliged to consider myself condemned and annihilated if I had not the consolation of seeing side by side with me in the prisoner's dock hundreds of fellow-culprits, among them many of the most trusted observers and most esteemed biologists. The great majority of all the diagrams in the best biological textbooks, treatises and journals would incur in the same degree the charge of 'forgery,' for all of them are inexact, and are more or less doctored, schematised and constructed.

This admission by Haeckel shows that falsehood and deception are techniques frequently resorted to by evolutionists and that they have no hesitations about persisting in them.

Yet, these illustrations, which everyone knew to be false, were nevertheless taught as a scientific reality in textbooks, all over the world throughout the course of the 20th century.

And, they are still being taught as such today.

THE “NEBRASKA MAN” SCANDAL

In 1922, a time of intense efforts aimed at finding evidence for the theory of evolution, Henry Fairfield Osborn, director of the American Museum of Natural History, announced that he had discovered a fossil molar tooth dating back to the Pliocene epoch near Snake Valley in West Nebraska.

It was commonly agreed, on the basis of one single tooth, that this belonged to a so-called “ape-man.”

Profound scientific debates were initiated on the subject, which was in fact nothing more than a fantasy.

This fossil, which sparked off great controversy, was given the name of “Nebraska Man.”

Nebraska Man was also immediately given a "scientific name," Hesperopithecus haroldcooki.

Many authorities supported Osborn.

On the basis of this single tooth, reconstructions were made of Nebraska Man’s skull and body.

They went even further and published illustrations of Nebraska Man with his wife and children in their natural environment.

Once again evolutionists began mobilizing all the means at their disposal for a fictitious scenario.

William Bryan, a politician from the state of Nebraska correctly maintained that the evidence regarding Nebraska Man was totally inadequate, that the evidence available proved nothing, and that people needed to wait for a while longer.

Aware that they would be left without their only so-called evidence, evolutionist scientists immediately counter-attacked and began issuing statements to the effect that Bryan’s mindset was outdated and far from being scientific.

Other parts of the skeleton were discovered in 1927.

According to these, the original tooth belonged neither to an ape nor a human being. It was realized that the tooth belonged to an extinct species of American wild boar.

An article by William Gregory, in Science magazine, which announced this error, was titled, "HESPEROPITHECUS APPARENTLY NOT AN APE NOR A MAN."

As a result, Hesperopithecus haroldcooki and his “family” were hurriedly removed from the relevant literature.

Yet, as usual, evolutionists continued to behave as if nothing had happened.

THE ARCHAEOPTERYX DECEPTION

The only evidence that evolutionists point to in favor of their claims that “birds evolved from dinosaurs” is the 150-million-year old fossil bird Archaeopteryx, which they maintain was a half-bird and a half-dinosaur unable to fly particularly well.

However, the latest discoveries have shown that the animal in question is merely an extinct species of bird.

The fact that it lacked a “sternum,” the breastbone where the muscles essential for flight are attached, was indicated as the most important evidence that it was unable to fly.

The seventh Archaeopteryx fossil to be discovered in 1992, however, showed that the creature did actually possess such a bone, contrary to what evolutionists had imagined.

The presence of this bone proved that Archaeopteryx was a flying bird.

Evolutionists depicted the claws on its wings and, the teeth in its jaw as proof that Archaeopteryx was an intermediate form.

But, this was distortion, rather than evidence.

Birds such as the Taouraco and the hoatzin, which are living today, also have claws permitting them to cling onto branches.

Some other birds that lived in the past also had teeth.

The fact that Archaeopteryx had asymmetrical feathers is another indication that it was a flying bird. This characteristic is to be found in all flying birds, and permits them to fly by giving an aerodynamic structure.

All of these findings show that there is no foundation to the evolutionist claims that Archaeopteryx was an intermediate form.

Despite being an evolutionist, Alan Feduccia, a professor from North Carolina University and one of the world’s most eminent ornithologists, strongly opposes the theory that birds are related to dinosaurs. Feduccia says:

Well, I've studied bird skulls for 25 years and I don't see any similarities whatsoever. I just don't see it ... The [so-called] theropod origins of birds, in my opinion, will be the greatest embarrassment of paleontology of the 20th century.

In addition, the recent discovery of fossil flying birds that lived at the same time as Archaeopteryx have also totally discredited the claim that Archaeopteryx was an intermediate in the imaginary transition from dinosaurs to birds.

Of these, the beak, feathers, and skeletal structure of the 140-million-year-old Confuciusornis, discovered in China in 1995 and more or less the same age as Archaeopteryx, exhibit exactly the same characteristics as those of present-day birds.

This totally discredits the evolutionist thesis to the effect that Archaeopteryx was the primitive ancestor of all birds.

The 130-million-year-old fossil bird, Liaoningornis, again discovered in China in November 1996, and the 120-million-year-old Eoalulavis, were also identical to living birds in terms of structures and mechanisms, and they were able to fly in a perfect manner.

In an analysis in Discover magazine, Professor Alan Feduccia stated that Liaoningornis disproved the evolutionist thesis that birds are descended from dinosaurs.

What is the origin of birds? This fossil [Liaoningornis] tells us that it is not the dinosaurs.

THE MYTH OF THE PEPPERED MOTHS

The tale of the “peppered moths” is depicted as one of the major pieces of evidence in favor of evolution in just about all biology textbooks subscribing to the theory of evolution.

This tale is based on an experiment performed by the evolutionist British biologist, Bernard Kettlewell, in the 1950s, and which may be summarized as follows:

At the beginning of the industrial revolution in England, the bark on the trees in the area around Manchester was light in color.

For that reason, dark colored moths landing on the trunks of those trees were easily visible to birds that fed on the species, and their survival was thus, seriously reduced.

Fifty years later, however, the death of the light colored lichen on the tree bark, the result of industrial pollution, led to the trees becoming darker in color.

Accordingly, during this time, light colored moths became preys for birds more often.

This time, the number of light colored moths declined, with darker ones multiplying because they had become invisible.

Evolutionists maintain that this is major confirmation of Darwin’s claim of evolution by way of natural selection, and that light colored moths gradually evolved into dark colored moths.

But, this is a deception.

This is because both types of moth had been in existence from the very beginning. Both species of moth had, in fact, been seen in a moth collection made in 1811, long before the emergence of industrial pollution in the 1850s.

There is, therefore, no question of a new species emerging by one turning into the other.

All that had happened was a change in the numbers of already existing moth species. The moths acquired no new organs or features that might lead to a “species change.”

That is the general response to be given to evolutionist claims regarding the peppered moths.

However, there is another even more interesting aspect to the subject:

In the same way that the evolutionist explanation is incorrect, it also consists of a blatant deception. In his book, The Icons of Evolution, published in 2000, the molecular biologist, Jonathan Wells, describes how the experiment performed by Kettlewell was actually a scientific scandal.

“The moths,” photographed by Kettlewell, “on tree bark,” were actually dead.

Kettlewell attached these dead creatures on the tree bark with pins and adhesives, and photographed them.

Since the moths settle on the undersides of branches rather than on the tree trunks, Kettlewell had no means of taking any such pictures.

It was eventually realized that Kettlewell’s account of “peppered moths” was based on a fraudulent experiment.

Researchers investigating peppered moths encountered an even more striking state of affairs; while one would expect there to be greater numbers of light colored moths in those parts of Britain unaffected by industrial pollution, there were actually four times as many dark colored moths as light colored moths.

In other words, there was no correlation between the moth populations and tree bark of the kind claimed by Kettlewell, and repeated in just about every evolutionist reference source.

This collapse of the peppered moth myth, the main element in “introductory courses in evolution” for decades, created enormous disappointment among evolutionists.

One of these evolutionists, Jerry Coyne, admitted thus:

My own reaction resembles the dismay attending my discovery, at the age of six, that it was my father and not Santa who brought the presents on Christmas Eve.

Thus, it was that, the “most famous instance of natural selection” went down in history as a scientific scandal.

THE “EQUINE EVOLUTION” DECEIT

One of the claims espoused by adherents of the theory of evolution for many years is the “scenario of the evolution of the horse.”

According to this imaginary scenario, a dog-like creature, known as Eohippus, which lived some 55 million years ago during the Eocene epoch, is supposedly the horse’s first ancestor.

This dog-like animal is then alleged to have subsequently evolved, becoming more developed and turning into life forms bearing a closer resemblance to the horse.

Eventually, the present-day horse emerged.

The fact is, however, that Eohippus, depicted as the so-called ancestor of the horse and which became extinct millions of years ago, is almost identical to the animal known as the hyrax, which is still living in Africa and has nothing to do with the horse whatsoever.

In addition, fossils of horse species existing today have been discovered in the same stratum as Eohippus, depicted as supposedly the earliest ancestor of the horse.

The fact that the present-day horse and its supposed forebear were living at one and the same time is proof that the imaginary process known as equine evolution never happened.

The invalidity of the myth of equine evolution has been admitted by a great many evolutionists.

Paleontologists Don Prothero and Neil Shubin’s ideas regarding the horse sequence are as follows:

... Throughout the history of horses, the species are well-marked and static over millions of years. At high resolution, the gradualistic picture of horse evolution becomes a complex bush of overlapping, closely related species.

It has been calculated that, the true dimensions of the living things portrayed as the forerunners of the horse and arranged chronologically in order of size, from small to large, in the sequence in question, have been distorted.

In his book, The Great Evolution Mystery, the evolutionist author, Gordon Rattray Taylor, describes this deception with these words:

But the fact is that the line from Eohippus to Equus [present-day horse] is very erratic. It is alleged to show a continual increase in size, but the truth is that some variants were smaller than Eohippus, not larger.

In November 1980, a four-day conference attended by 150 evolutionists and considering the problems facing the theory of evolution was held at the Chicago Museum of Natural History.

Boyce Rensberger, one of the speakers at the conference, expressed his thoughts in these words:

The popularly told example of horse evolution, suggesting a gradual sequence of changes from four-toed fox-sized creatures living nearly 50 million years ago to today's much larger one-toed horse, has long been known to be wrong.

American paleontologist Niles Eldredge has this to say on the subject:

I admit that an awful lot of that has gotten into the textbooks as though it were true. For instance, the most famous example still on exhibit downstairs is the exhibit on horse evolution prepared perhaps 50 years ago. That has been presented as literal truth in textbook after textbook. Now I think that that is lamentable, particularly because the people who propose these kinds of stories themselves may be aware of the speculative nature of some of the stuff.

All of these facts have revealed that the schematic illustrations of the supposed evolution of the horse, depicted as one of the soundest pieces of evidence in favor of evolution, actually consist of distortions devoid of any reality.

THE FICTITIOUS HUMAN FAMILY TREE

Evolutionists base their thesis of so-called “human evolution,” their major claim, on fictitious and imaginary family tree diagrams.

They do not have the slightest evidence to support their claim that human beings evolved.

For that reason, they manufacture their own evidence by completing the various skull and bone fragments they collect during excavations with hoax illustrations in whatever manner they so choose.

They give these imaginary pictures various names and create a supposed “family tree of human evolution” by setting them out in a sequence of their own choosing.

The “Nebraska Man” hoax, which you saw earlier in this film, is one of the most notable examples of these imaginary representations.

Evolutionists produced images of a fictitious human ancestor on the basis of a single tooth that would later prove to belong to a boar.

They went even further, and added representations of his wife and children.

The imaginary species to which they gave the name, Nebraska Man, was, for years, portrayed as scientific evidence in evolutionary literature.

Naturally, evolutionists’ efforts to produce false evidence did not come to an end with the “Nebraska Man.”

Proponents of evolution have produced countless false intermediate forms for their imaginary family tree on the basis of various fragments of bone they have discovered.

What encourages evolutionists to produce such false evidence is the large numbers of fossils on which they can base their groundless speculation.

More than 6000 species of ape are known to have lived over the course of history.

A large part of these have become extinct and disappeared.

Today, there are only 120 species of ape in the world.

Therefore, the fossil remains of around 6000 extinct species of ape represent a rich resource for evolutionists.

Evolutionists put together skulls and bone fragments from some of these extinct species according to their requirements.

They then arrange these in order of size, from small to large, and write scenarios of human evolution by adding skulls belonging to some extinct human races to this series.

This scenario contains a great many imaginary species that never actually existed at all.

The false nature of all these imaginary species claimed to represent the forerunners of human beings, such as Java man, Beijing Man, and Lucy, have all been demonstrated over and over again.

And, evolutionists have countless times admitted that the fossils they have submitted as evidence are a very far cry from being, in the slightest bit, scientific.

A great many fake fossils have been proposed as so-called forerunners of human beings, including

“Java Man,” discovered on the island of Java by the Dutch anatomist, Eugene Dubois, and claimed, on the basis of a skull, which later transpired to belong to a gibbon, to be a so-called ancestor of human beings.

“Beijing Man” was heralded as a forerunner of human beings on the basis of independent bone fragments found at different times over the course of a 10-year period in the area around Beijing. These fragments then mysteriously disappeared, leaving behind nothing more than fantastical pictures and models.

Then, there was the “Pithecanthropus” fossil, discovered in India in 1932, and alleged to represent the first stage in the supposed transition from ape to man. This was used as definitive evidence by evolutionists for 50 years, until it was realized in 1982 that the fossil actually belonged to an ancient species of orangutan.

The fossil known as “Lucy” was discovered by the American anthropologist, Donald Johanson, in 1974, and was regarded as the symbol of evolution for decades. Subsequently, even evolutionists abandoned it when it was realized that Lucy actually belonged to an extinct form of chimpanzee.

Then, there was the skull fragment found near the town of Orce, in Spain, in 1983, announced to be the oldest human fossil in Europe and inserted into evolutionist literature under the name of “Orce Man.” Later, it emerged that the skull fragment actually belonged to a four-month-old donkey.

These are just a few of the hoax fossils that evolutionists have come up with in order to provide supposed evidence for human evolution.

In conclusion, all the paleontological, anatomical, and biological discoveries that have been made show that, like all other such claims, the claim of the evolution of man is completely invalid.

The fossil record shows that throughout the course of history, human beings have always existed as human beings, and apes have always existed as apes.

There is absolutely no concrete evidence of any familial link between human beings and apes…

… apart from frauds, distortions, sleight of hand, misleading illustrations, and fictitious interpretations.

THE WORLD OF SCIENCE HAS BEEN MISLED FOR 30 YEARS!

The way that every one of the false proofs, manufactured by evolutionists over the years, has been unmasked has led evolutionists in the direction of new and even more shameless frauds.

A recent example is the hoax maintained by one evolutionist professor for 30 years, and that only then came to light.

The fraud was announced in an article published in the August 16, 2004, edition of the German magazine, Der Spiegel.

The report described how the evolutionary anthropologist, Professor Reiner Protsch von Zieten, head of the Frankfurt University carbon dating laboratory since 1973, had deliberately distorted the ages of several important fossils.

The lies told by the professor, who was forced to resign as a result of this development, are still described as “facts” in anthropology textbooks, and the authorities admit that radical changes need to be made in order for these to be corrected.

According to the findings of the commission of enquiry, Professor Protsch had systematically distorted the ages of a series of fossils unearthed in Europe, portraying them as thousands of years older than they actually were.

The scandal regarding the evolutionist professor went even further than this.

In addition to what we have just heard, the British daily, The Guardian, wrote that the professor had also manufactured fake fossils.

The Guardian account included a statement from the university, saying: “The commission finds that Prof. Protsch has forged and manipulated scientific facts over the past 30 years.”

The fraud came to light when fossil specimens, unearthed in Europe and claimed by Professor Protsch to date back to the Pliocene epoch, came into doubt. They were sent to Oxford University for further tests.

The results obtained from the university radiocarbon dating unit revealed a complete “fiasco,” as scientists described it.

It was realized that a female skeleton, Protsch had dated as 21,300 years old, was in fact only 3,300 years old, and another one to which he attributed an age of 27,400 years transpired to belong to an old man who had died only some 250 years previously.

Among the fossils to which the professor had attributed false dates was, Hahnhöfersand Man, which evolutionists had portrayed as a highly significant intermediate form.

The false age attributed by Protsch to Hahnhöfersand Man was 36,000 years.

Protsch declared that this fossil represented an important missing link in so-called human evolution, and the fossil went on show in the Helms Museum in Hamburg.

The walls of the museum were bedecked with posters depicting Hahnhöfersand Man as an ape-man in a completely fantastical manner.

Tens of thousands of visitors flocked to the museum.

However, the fossil was actually proof of evolutionist fraud rather than showing the validity of the theory of evolution.

An enormous deception was being perpetrated.

The truth emerged when the latest tests carried out in Oxford showed that the fossil, which evolutionists were presenting under an ape-man guise, was in fact only 7,500 years old.

Hahnhöfersand Man was an ordinary human being who lived a mere 2,000 years before such civilizations as Sumer and Ancient Egypt, and who had nothing whatsoever to do with the fictitious ape-man depicted on the posters.

Evolutionists “manufactured” a fictitious ape-man from a human fossil and submitted this method, the true name of which is unequivocally fraud, before the public as “science.”

Since evolutionists are devoid of any grounds apart from false and misleading evidence, they resort to all kinds of indoctrination, propaganda, and sleight of hand in order to keep their theory alive.

As we have just seen, the way that evolutionists deceived tens of thousands of people by exhibiting Protsch’s fraudulent fossil in a museum as evidence of evolution is one of the techniques in question.

Sadly, evolutionists are still applying the same techniques and are attempting to impose the lie of evolution on public as if it were a scientific reality.

Exhibitions of evolution held in many parts of the world are concrete examples of evolutionist propaganda encouraging people to believe in an unscientific theory for totally ideological reasons by displaying false evidence of evolution.

It is high time that the proponents of evolution realized that people are much more aware of such propaganda, which particularly targets children and young people by mustering support from one section of the press, than was the case in the past. This propaganda will no longer have the impact it once did.

CONCLUSION

Modern science has proved that life and the nature is the work of an Almighty and Omniscient Creator.

The evidence that has accumulated over the decades in such areas of science as paleontology, microbiology, molecular biology, biochemistry, and genetics has definitively discredited the theory of evolution and proved that it is nothing more than a myth.

As we have seen throughout the course of this film, evolutionists are in a state of despair because of science’s failure to provide the evidence they seek; and they resort to “manufacturing” such evidence by unscientific means.

That is the reason for the efforts to keep the theory of evolution – the worst deception in the history of science – on its feet by fraudulent means.

New evolutionist frauds are inevitable, so long as these efforts continue.

It is crystal clear, however, that opposing the facts, and especially by resorting to deception and other unscientific methods, will continue to be a waste of time and bear no fruit whatsoever